Literature DB >> 7944052

A clinical rule to predict preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients after myocardial infarction.

M T Silver1, G A Rose, S D Paul, C J O'Donnell, P T O'Gara, K A Eagle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a clinical prediction rule that identifies patients after myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study, with a derivation set to generate a clinical prediction rule and a validation set to test the prediction rule.
SETTING: Urban tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 314 consecutive patients admitted with myocardial infarction who had one or more of the following tests to determine left ventricular ejection fraction: transthoracic echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, or radionuclide ventriculography. MEASUREMENTS: Left ventricular ejection fractions were determined by transthoracic echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, and gated blood pool scan.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of patients in the derivation set yielded the following rule: The left ventricular ejection fraction is predicted to be 40% or more in patients who have 1) an interpretable electrocardiogram, 2) no previous Q-wave myocardial infarction, 3) no history of congestive heart failure, and 4) an index myocardial infarction that is not a Q-wave anterior infarction. In the derivation and the validation sets, the positive predictive value of the prediction rule was more than 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple clinical prediction rule using easily obtained historical and electrocardiographic data reliably identifies a substantial percentage of patients after myocardial infarction (40% in our hospital) who are likely to have preserved left ventricular systolic function. If validated in other patient populations, application of this prediction rule in clinical practice could result in a substantial decrease in the cost of treating uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7944052     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-10-199411150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  6 in total

Review 1.  A primer of biostatistic and economic methods for diagnostic and prognostic modeling in nuclear cardiology: Part I.

Authors:  L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch; E L Eisenstein; K L Kesler; G V Heller; D D Miller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Approaches to measuring ejection fraction: Many tools, but how to decide which one?

Authors:  Lawrence M Phillips; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Risk assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care: cross sectional study evaluating a range of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  O W Nielsen; J F Hansen; J Hilden; C T Larsen; J Svanegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-22

4.  Left ventricular atrioventricular plane displacement: an echocardiographic technique for rapid assessment of prognosis in heart failure.

Authors:  R Willenheimer; C Cline; L Erhardt; B Israelsson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  The third heart sound for diagnosis of acute heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Johnston; Sean P Collins; Alan B Storrow
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2007-09

6.  Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jong-Wook Ban; Emma Wallace; Richard Stevens; Rafael Perera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.