Literature DB >> 7944040

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laboratory predictors of choledocholithiasis.

S C Stain1, L S Marsri, E T Froes, V Sharma, D Parekh.   

Abstract

Liver function tests (LFTs) are most often employed to select patients for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and therapeutic sphincterotomy. Although ERC accurately detects CBD stones, the associated financial costs and potential morbidity argue against its indiscriminate use. We analyzed the value of LFTs to predict CBD stones in patients treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). CBD stones were identified in 41 of 660 patients (6.2%) treated by LC during the study period (January 1991 to May 1993). CBD stones were identified by preoperative ERC in 19 of 33 patients (57.6%); by operative cholangiography in 18 of 289 patients (6.2%), and by postoperative ERC in 4 patients. In patients with CBD stones, there was a significant difference in alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, SGPT, and SGOT (P < 0.001). The positive predictive value (PPV) of a value > normal at admission was 5%-19%; and immediately before operation was 9%-36%. The PPV of a value > 2X normal was 30%-47%. Alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin were independent predictors of CBD stones. If both were greater than twice normal, there was a 55 per cent incidence of CBD stones. Our analysis suggests that patients with greater than twice normal liver function tests have a sufficient incidence of CBD stones to warrant ERC. Patients without both these criteria should be managed by laparoscopic CBDE, with postoperative endoscopic stone retrieval for the failures of laparoscopic CBDE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7944040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

1.  Suspected biliary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy leading to endoscopic cholangiography: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  C F Gholson; C Dungan; G Neff; R Ferguson; D Favrot; I Nandy; P Banish; K Sittig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Predictors of common bile duct lithiasis in laparoscopic era.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Georgia Dedemadi; Athanasios Stamatelopoulos; Emmanuel Leandros; Dionysius Voros; Konstantinos Karaliotas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

4.  Use of Liver Function Tests as First-line Diagnostic Tools for Predicting Common Bile Duct Stones in Acute Cholecystitis Patients.

Authors:  Keun Soo Ahn; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Ho-Seong Han; Jai Young Cho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  E J M van Geenen; D L van der Peet; C J J Mulder; M A Cuesta; M J Bruno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Clinicopathological features of choledocholithiasis patients with high aminotransferase levels without cholangitis: Prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Cheal Wung Huh; Sung Ill Jang; Beom Jin Lim; Hee Wook Kim; Jae Keun Kim; Jun Sung Park; Ja Kyung Kim; Se Joon Lee; Dong Ki Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.