Literature DB >> 7943709

Difficulties in spinal needle use. Insertion characteristics and failure rates associated with 25-, 27- and 29-gauge Quincke-type spinal needles.

P Tarkkila1, J Huhtala, U Salminen.   

Abstract

The effect of different size (25-, 27- and 29-gauge) Quincke-type spinal needles on the incidence of insertion difficulties and failure rates was investigated in a randomised, prospective study with 300 patients. The needle size was randomised but the insertion procedure was standardised. The time to achieve dural puncture was significantly longer with the 29-gauge spinal needle compared with the larger bore needles and was due to the greater flexibility of the thin needle. However, the difference was less than 1 min and cannot be considered clinically significant. There were no significant differences between groups in the number of insertion attempts or failures and the same sensory level of analgesia was reached with all the needle sizes studied. Postoperatively, no postdural puncture headaches occurred in the 29-gauge spinal needle group, whilst in the 25- and 27-gauge needle groups, the postdural puncture headache rates were 7.4% and 2.1% respectively. The incidence of backache was similar in all study groups. We conclude that dural puncture with a 29-gauge spinal needle is clinically as easy as with larger bore needles and its use is indicated in patients who have a high risk of postdural puncture headache.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7943709     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04410.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

Review 1.  Finer gauge of cutting but not pencil-point needles correlate with lower incidence of post-dural puncture headache: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Andres Zorrilla-Vaca; Ryan Healy; Carolina Zorrilla-Vaca
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

Authors:  Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Luis Muñoz; Natalia Godoy-Casasbuenas; Agustín Ciapponi; Jimmy J Arevalo; Sabine Boogaard; Marta Roqué I Figuls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

3.  Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade.

Authors:  Tomislav Ružman; Danijela Gulam; Ivana Haršanji Drenjančević; Darija Venžera-Azenić; Nataša Ružman; Jelena Burazin
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2014-10-08

4.  Comparison of ease of induction of spinal anaesthesia in sitting with legs parallel on the table versus traditional sitting position.

Authors:  Jide Michael Afolayan; Peter Olufemi Areo; Patrick Temi Adegun; Kolawole Olubunmi Ogundipe; Aderemi Benjamin Filani
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-11-13

5.  Correlation between spinous process dimensions and ease of spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Hariharan Shankar; Kanishka Rajput; Karthik Murugiah
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-05

6.  Straight versus flex back: Does it matter in spinal anaesthesia?

Authors:  Binay Kumar Biswas; Bikash Agarwal; Balakrishna Bhattarai; Samarjit Dey; Prithwish Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.