Literature DB >> 7943488

Gynecologists' sex, clinical beliefs, and hysterectomy rates.

N A Bickell1, J A Earp, J M Garrett, A T Evans.   

Abstract

This study determined how gynecologists' sex, beliefs, appropriateness ratings, and practice characteristics influence hysterectomy rates in North Carolina. Gynecologists who performed hysterectomies at higher rates were further from training, practiced in areas with fewer gynecologists, and had more patients with abnormal bleeding or cancer. Male gynecologists performed 60% more hysterectomies than female gynecologists, but this may have been because they were further from their training. Appropriateness ratings were affected by gynecologists' attitudes toward surgery, recency of training, and practice case mix, and by patients' expressed desire to avoid surgery, but they did not predict hysterectomy rates. To decrease their chances of undergoing hysterectomy, patients should express their preferences and possibly seek the opinion of more recently trained gynecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7943488      PMCID: PMC1615070          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  17 in total

1.  Estrogen and progestin therapy to prevent osteoporosis: attitudes and practices of general internists and gynecologists.

Authors:  G A Greendale; K J Carlson; I Schiff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Relation between surgeons' practice volumes and geographic variation in the rate of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  L L Leape; R E Park; D H Solomon; M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Indications for hysterectomy.

Authors:  K J Carlson; D H Nichols; I Schiff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Attitudes of internal medicine subspecialty fellows toward primary care.

Authors:  J A Earp; S W Fletcher; M S O'Malley; R H Fletcher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1984-02

5.  Here come the women.

Authors:  A S Relman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography.

Authors:  R H Brook; R E Park; M R Chassin; D H Solomon; J Keesey; J Kosecoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices.

Authors:  N P Roos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Survey of men and women residents entering United States obstetrics and gynecology programs in 1981.

Authors:  A J Margolis; S Greenwood; D Heilbron
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Physician behaviors that correlate with patient satisfaction.

Authors:  L M Comstock; E M Hooper; J M Goodwin; J S Goodwin
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1982-02

10.  Sex preference in patient selection of a family physician.

Authors:  J M Kelly
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  8 in total

1.  A matter of opinion about hysterectomies: experts' and practicing community gynecologists' ratings of appropriateness.

Authors:  N A Bickell; J Earp; A T Evans; S J Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Inpatient surgical treatment patterns for patients with uterine fibroids in the United States, 1998-2002.

Authors:  Edmund R Becker; James Spalding; Janeen DuChane; Ira R Horowitz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  The impact of nonclinical factors on practice variations: the case of hysterectomies.

Authors:  S E Geller; L R Burns; D J Brailer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy Autry; Gavin Jacobson; Robert Domush; Sanae Nakagawa; Alison Jacoby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Using geographically weighted Poisson regression to examine the association between socioeconomic factors and hysterectomy incidence in Wallonia, Belgium.

Authors:  Aline Poliart; Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou; Mady Ouédraogo; Philippe Collart; Dominique Dubourg; Sékou Samadoulougou
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Patterns of black and white hysterectomy incidence among reproductive aged women.

Authors:  Danielle R Gartner; Paul L Delamater; Robert A Hummer; Jennifer L Lund; Brian W Pence; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 7.  The End of the Hysterectomy Epidemic and Endometrial Cancer Incidence: What Are the Unintended Consequences of Declining Hysterectomy Rates?

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Lori Minasian; Anne-Michelle Noone
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India.

Authors:  Sapna Desai; Oona Mr Campbell; Tara Sinha; Ajay Mahal; Simon Cousens
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.