Literature DB >> 7942727

Twenty-four-hour gastric luminal pH in normal subjects: influence of probe position, food, posture, and duodenogastric reflux.

A P Barlow1, R A Hinder, T R DeMeester, K Fuchs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the gastric pH at different levels in the stomach under varying physiological circumstances.
METHODS: Simultaneous 24-hour ambulatory gastric pH monitoring was performed with multiple electrodes in 24 normal subjects, divided into groups of six, to study the influence of food, the supine posture, and physiological duodenogastric reflux on gastric pH in different parts of the stomach. In 18 subjects, simultaneous recordings were made from two electrodes positioned 5 and/or 10 cm below the manometrically-defined lower border of the lower esophageal sphincter and, in six subjects, from three electrodes, one positioned 5 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter and two others positioned 5 and 8 cm proximal to the pylorus.
RESULTS: During the daytime fasting period, pH was homogenous across the stomach with most time being spent between pH 1 and 2. Marked similarities in recorded pH were noted when two probes were placed in the stomach at the same level, indicating regional consistency in the pH of the chyme. This finding was observed when probes were free from each other or tethered together. Food increased pH most in the fundus, less in the midstomach, and least in the antrum. At night, when supine, alkaline shifts occurred in the distal stomach, most likely because of physiological duodenogastric reflux. These were commonly recorded in the antrum but only occasionally in the proximal stomach.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the gastric pH environment requires standardization of the probe position, of feeding, and of posture, and global measurement of gastric pH requires simultaneous recording in both the proximal and distal stomach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7942727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of duodenogastric reflux by combined continuous intragastric pH and bilirubin monitoring.

Authors:  Fei Dai; Jun Gong; Ru Zhang; Jin-Yan Luo; You-Ling Zhu; Xue-Qin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The role of regurgitation and other symptoms of reflux disease in palatal dental erosion; an audit project.

Authors:  D W Bartlett; A Anggiansah; B G Smith; E A Kidd
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket in patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Fernando P P Vicentine; Jose C Del Grande; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Nocturnal antral pH rises are related to duodenal phase III retroperistalsis.

Authors:  E S Björnsson; H Abrahamsson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Fernando P P Vicentine; Jose C Del Grande; Marco G Patti; Carlos H Arasaki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  24-Hour Measurement of Gastric pH in Rural South Africa.

Authors:  Alastair M Sammon; Eugene J Ndebia; Ekambaram Umapathy; Jehu E Iputo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Large Buffering Effect of the Duodenal Bulb in Duodenal Switch: a Wireless pH-Metric Study.

Authors:  Z Bekhali; J Hedberg; H Hedenström; M Sundbom
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evaluation of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Roelof W F van Leeuwen; Frank G A Jansman; Nicole G Hunfeld; Robert Peric; Anna K L Reyners; Alex L T Imholz; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Joachim G Aerts; Teun van Gelder; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Serial Measurements of Refractive Index, Glucose and Protein to Assess Gastric Liquid Nutrient Transport-A Proof-of-Principal Study.

Authors:  Matthias Wittstock; Matthias Kästner; Stephan Kolbaske; Tina Sellmann; Katrin Porath; Robert Patejdl
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-03

10.  S-Adenosyl-L-methionine protects the probiotic yeast, Saccharomyces boulardii, from acid-induced cell death.

Authors:  Vincent Cascio; Daniel Gittings; Kristen Merloni; Matthew Hurton; David Laprade; Nicanor Austriaco
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.605

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.