Literature DB >> 7941506

Restaurant noise, hearing loss, and hearing aids.

C P Lebo1, M F Smith, E R Mosher, S J Jelonek, D R Schwind, K E Decker, H J Krusemark, P L Kurz.   

Abstract

Our multidisciplinary team obtained noise data in 27 San Francisco Bay Area restaurants. These data included typical minimum, peak, and average sound pressure levels; digital tape recordings; subjective noise ratings; and on-site unaided and aided speech discrimination tests. We report the details and implications of these noise measurements and provide basic information on selecting hearing aids and suggestions for coping with restaurant noise.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 7941506      PMCID： PMC1011367     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN： 0093-0415


  9 in total

1.  The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech.

Authors:  Keiko Ishikawa; Suzanne Boyce; Lisa Kelchner; Maria Golla Powell; Heidi Schieve; Alessandro de Alarcon; Sid Khosla
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Occupational Noise Exposure of Employees at Locally-Owned Restaurants in a College Town.

Authors:  Deirdre R Green; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise.

Authors:  Lauren V Hadley; W Owen Brimijoin; William M Whitmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  David M Kessler; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Spencer B Smith; Kristen D'Onofrio; René H Gifford
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Lombard effect, intelligibility, ambient noise, and willingness to spend time and money in a restaurant amongst older adults.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Rachael N Piper; Brianna Legner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Noise exposure and hearing impairment among Chinese restaurant workers and entertainment employees in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Xiang Qian Lao; Ignatius Tak Sun Yu; Dennis Kin Kwok Au; Yuk Lan Chiu; Claudie Chiu Yi Wong; Tze Wai Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the Interaction of Head and Gaze Control With Acoustic Beam Width of a Simulated Beamformer in a Two-Talker Scenario.

Authors:  Ĺuboš Hládek; Bernd Porr; Graham Naylor; Thomas Lunner; W Owen Brimijoin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.