Literature DB >> 7937226

The probability of defibrillation success and the incidence of postshock arrhythmia as a function of shock strength.

A W Cates1, P D Wolf, R E Hillsley, J J Souza, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

The effects of high voltage defibrillation shocks given to six swine were studied to determine if there is a limit to the advantage gained from increasing the shock strength. An endocardial electrode was placed in the right ventricle, and a 114-cm2 cutaneous patch was placed on the left lateral thorax. Monophasic (10 msec) and single capacitor biphasic (5/5 msec) shocks with leading edge voltages of 200, 400, 600, 800, and 990 volts (approximately 2.3-59 J) were tested. For monophasic shocks, the probability of successful defibrillation ranged from 0% at 200 V to 90% at 990 V. The incidence of postshock arrhythmia increased from 0% for successful shocks at 600 V to 67% for successful shocks at 990 V. For biphasic shocks, the probability of success peaked at 97% for the 600-, 800-, and 990-V shocks. The incidence of postshock arrhythmia increased from 8% at 400 V to 55% at 990 V. Although more postshock arrhythmias occurred at lower strengths for biphasic than for monophasic shocks, an efficacy criterion, quantifying the probability of defibrillation success and the probability that a postshock arrhythmia will not occur, was always higher for biphasic shocks. The probability of success never reached 100% for either waveform while the incidence of postshock arrhythmia increased as the shock strength increased. In conclusion, for the catheter-patch electrode configuration, increasing the shock strength does not always improve the probability of success and may increase the incidence of postshock arrhythmia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7937226     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01487.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  High-energy defibrillation increases the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  Yang Pang; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Shujing Ren; Tianyou Ling; Ying Chen; Gang Gu; Yongchu Shen; Liqun Wu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Ionic mechanism of shock-induced arrhythmias: role of intracellular calcium.

Authors:  Brittany Sowell; Vladimir G Fast
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 3.  The Defibrillation Conundrum: New Insights into the Mechanisms of Shock-Related Myocardial Injury Sustained from a Life-Saving Therapy.

Authors:  Nicolas Clementy; Alexandre Bodin; Arnaud Bisson; Ana-Paula Teixeira-Gomes; Sebastien Roger; Denis Angoulvant; Valérie Labas; Dominique Babuty
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.