Literature DB >> 7936565

Conformance with preferred practice patterns in caring for patients with glaucoma.

K G Albrecht1, P P Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines are becoming more prominent in the provision of medical care. However, the limited data that exist suggests that conformance in ophthalmic care may be low.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 120 charts of patients with open-angle glaucoma was conducted to evaluate conformance with recommendations from the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Pattern for open-angle glaucoma. The criteria were operationalized for evaluation of three dimensions: (1) the performance of specified examination steps at the initial visit; (2) the performance of specified examination steps at follow-up; and (3) the time interval between follow-up visits.
RESULTS: In a sample where 70% of patients had stable moderate to severe glaucomatous damage, documentation of examination findings on the initial visit ranged from 70% for a pupil examination to 100% for intraocular pressure. At the initial visit, visual fields were obtained or scheduled in 92% of eyes, gonioscopy in 85%, and the disc/nerve fiber layer status in 98%. On follow-up, 90% of patients had an optic nerve head drawing or photograph within 9 months of the most recent visit. Finally, 100% of patients were scheduled for follow-up within the time intervals recommended by the Preferred Practice Pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the situation with diabetic retinopathy and corneal ulcers, there appears to be a high rate of conformance with recommended patterns of care for patients with open-angle glaucoma in a public clinic setting. Additional data are needed from other practice settings and for other patterns of care to not only assess the quality of care but to help guide revisions in preferred practice patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7936565     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31117-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

Review 1.  Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D A Davis; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Compliance With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Suspect Preferred Practice Patterns in a Retail-based Eye Clinic.

Authors:  Jordan Stanley; Carrie E Huisingh; Thomas A Swain; Gerald McGwin; Cynthia Owsley; Christopher A Girkin; Lindsay A Rhodes
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Establishing a Regional Glaucoma Physician Collaborative to Improve Quality of Care.

Authors:  Joshua R Ehrlich; Jeffrey N Wentzloff; Nauman R Imami; Taylor S Blachley; Joshua D Stein; Paul P Lee; Jennifer S Weizer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  A multicenter, retrospective chart review study comparing index therapy change rates in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients newly treated with latanoprost or travoprost-Z monotherapy.

Authors:  Joel M Fain; Sameer Kotak; Jack Mardekian; Jason Bacharach; Deepak P Edward; Steven Rauchman; Teresa Brevetti; Janet L Fox; Cherie Lovelace
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Comparison of resident and glaucoma faculty practice patterns in the care of open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Nazlee Zebardast; Jason F Solus; Harry A Quigley; Divya Srikumaran; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Geographic Variation in the Use of Diagnostic Testing of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Angela R Elam; Taylor S Blachley; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 14.277

7.  Eye Care Quality and Accessibility Improvement in the Community (EQUALITY) for adults at risk for glaucoma: study rationale and design.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Lindsay A Rhodes; Gerald McGwin; Stephen T Mennemeyer; Mary Bregantini; Nita Patel; Demond M Wiley; Frank LaRussa; Dan Box; Jinan Saaddine; John E Crews; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-11-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.