Literature DB >> 7934546

Identification of futility in intensive care.

S Atkinson1, D Bihari, M Smithies, K Daly, R Mason, I McColl.   

Abstract

Rising costs of intensive care and the ability to prolong the life of critically ill patients creates a need to recognise early those patients who will die despite treatment. We used changes in a modified APACHE II score (organ failure score) to make daily predictions of individual outcome in 3600 patients. 137 patients were predicted to die and of these, 131 (95.6%) died within 90 days of discharge from hospital (sensitivity 23.4%, specificity 99.8%); a false-positive diagnosis rate of 4.4%. 2 of the 6 survivors have subsequently died but 4 are alive with good quality of life. Patients predicted to die stayed 1492 days in intensive care and incurred 16.7% of total intensive care expenditure and 46.4% of the cost of all patients that died. Median survival after a prediction to die was 2 days, accounting for 62% of intensive care patient days in this patient group, giving an effective intensive care cost per survivor of UK 129,651 pounds. If used prospectively, this algorithm has the potential to indicate the futility of continued intensive care but at the cost of 1 in 20 patients who would survive if intensive care were continued.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APACHE; Death and Euthanasia; Guy's Hospital (London); Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7934546     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90514-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  10 in total

1.  Survival and functional outcome after prolonged intensive care unit stay.

Authors:  P A Lipsett; S M Swoboda; J Dickerson; M Ylitalo; T Gordon; M Breslow; K Campbell; T Dorman; P Pronovost; B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  [Ethics in intensive medicine].

Authors:  W F List
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Is this critically ill patient going to survive?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Jacques Creteur
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4. 

Authors:  D Krausch; W J Kox
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Identifying futility in a paediatric critical care setting: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  A Y Goh; Q Mok
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Rationing intensive care.

Authors:  J Bion
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-18

Review 7.  Resuscitation decisions in the elderly: a discussion of current thinking.

Authors:  P N Bruce-Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Gastroduodenal perfusion and mortality in mechanical ventilation-dependent patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Authors:  Mitchell J Spirt; Paul H Guth; Gayle Randall; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy in ICU patients independently predict hospital death.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pochard; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Delphine Moreau; Laurent Montesino; Christophe Adrie; Arnaud de Lassence; Yves Cohen; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Trauma intensive care in a terror-ravaged, resource-constrained setting: Are we prepared for the emerging challenge?

Authors:  K E Amaefule; I L Dahiru; U M Sule; F S Ejagwulu; M I Maitama; A Ibrahim
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.