Literature DB >> 7934164

Detection of BCR-ABL fusion genes in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia by the polymerase chain reaction.

J P Radich1, K J Kopecky, D H Boldt, D Head, M L Slovak, R Babu, J Kirk, A Lee, P Kessler, F Appelbaum.   

Abstract

The sensitivity and clinical utility of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of BCR-ABL gene rearrangement was compared to conventional cytogenetics for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients entered onto a single clinical trial. Ninety-three patients had evaluable PCR assays for both the p190bcr-abl and p210bcr-abl type of BCR-ABL gene rearrangements. Twenty-one of 93 patients (23%) were positive for the BCR-ABL rearrangement by the PCR assay. Fourteen of these patients had the p210brc-abl BCR-ABL rearrangement characteristically seen in CML patients, while seven had the p190bcr-abl rearrangement seen in ALL alone. Of 61 patients analyzed, both with conventional cytogenetics and PCR, eight (13%) were positive for the Ph1, while 14 (23%) were positive for the BCR-ABL rearrangement by the PCR assay. Discordance between the PCR assay and cytogenetics occurred in eight cases where the PCR assay was positive and the cytogenetics negative, and two cases where the PCR assay was negative and cytogenetics positive. PCR positivity did not correlate with treatment response, survival, or relapse-free survival, but there was a higher percentage of L2 FAB morphology in the PCR+ cases compared to the PCR-cases (67 vs. 28%, p = 0.003). In addition, the data suggested that patients with a p190bcr-abl rearrangement have a better response to induction therapy, but a worse relapse-free survival compared to patients with a p210bcr-abl breakpoint, but these differences were not statistically significant. These data suggest that PCR and conventional cytogenetics may provide complementary information, since there appear to be a subset of patients who are Ph1-negative yet BCR-ABL positive by PCR. Further studies will be required to determine the prognostic significance of the detailed information about BCR-ABL breakpoints that is available from the PCR assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7934164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of BCR-ABL molecular testing in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Amgad L Nashed; Kathleen W Rao; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Progress in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  F R Appelbaum
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-02

4.  Two groups of Philadelphia chromosome-positive childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia classified by pretreatment multidrug sensitivity or resistance in in vitro testing.

Authors:  Teruaki Hongo; Shuichi Okada; Noriko Inoue; Sayuri Yamada; Shuhei Yajima; Chieko Watanabe; Yuji Fujii; Yasuo Horikoshi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Analysis of 20-year follow-up study of LVP regimen for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Y Hatta; J Takeuchi; T Ohshima; A Horikoshi; Y Iizuka; M Kawamura; M Kanemaru; T Horie
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Heterogeneous BCR-ABL1 signal patterns identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization are associated with leukemic clonal evolution and poorer prognosis in BCR-ABL1 positive leukemia.

Authors:  Zhanglin Zhang; Zhiwei Chen; Mei Jiang; Shuyuan Liu; Yang Guo; Lagen Wan; Fei Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Ph+ ALL patients in first complete remission have similar survival after reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic transplantation: impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and minimal residual disease.

Authors:  V Bachanova; D I Marks; M-J Zhang; H Wang; M de Lima; M D Aljurf; M Arellano; A S Artz; U Bacher; J-Y Cahn; Y-B Chen; E A Copelan; W R Drobyski; R P Gale; J P Greer; V Gupta; G A Hale; P Kebriaei; H M Lazarus; I D Lewis; V A Lewis; J L Liesveld; M R Litzow; A W Loren; A M Miller; M Norkin; B Oran; J Pidala; J M Rowe; B N Savani; W Saber; R Vij; E K Waller; P H Wiernik; D J Weisdorf
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 11.528

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.