Literature DB >> 7933241

Early complications of contemporary anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy.

G L Andriole1, D S Smith, G Rao, L Goodnough, W J Catalona.   

Abstract

Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy is commonly performed to treat select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Because this recently introduced surgical technique is technically demanding, and since early detection programs have altered the age and stage distribution of men undergoing radical prostatectomy, earlier reports describing complication and death rates from radical prostatectomy may not accurately reflect contemporary experience. A retrospective review of 1,342 radical retropubic prostatectomies performed during a 5-year period showed an early complication rate of 7.4%. The most common complications were thromboembolic (pulmonary embolism) and cardiac (myocardial infarction). Patient age, mode of diagnosis (transurethral resection of the prostate versus needle biopsy) and pathological stage of the tumor did not correlate with the rate of complications. Three patients died in this series (0.2%). This retrospective review shows that contemporary anatomical retropubic radical prostatectomy may be performed with acceptably low early morbidity and mortality rates, and that appropriate selection of chronologically older patients is not associated with significantly greater rates of early complications. These data may be useful in decision analytic models evaluating the role of therapy for patients with early stage prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7933241     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32400-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Venous thromboembolism in urologic surgery: prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Kevin R Rice; Stephen A Brassell; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

4.  Effective local control of prostate cancer by intratumoral injection of (166)Ho-chitosan complex (DW-166HC) in rats.

Authors:  Cheol Kwak; Sung Kyu Hong; Seung Kyoo Seong; Jei Man Ryu; Moon Soo Park; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Risk factors of perioperative complications in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: A ten-year experience.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Liu; Liang Liu; Kun Chang; Ding-Wei Ye; Yong-Fa Zheng; Xu-Dong Yao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-06

Review 6.  Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  M C Beduschi; R Beduschi; J E Oesterling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: asking men what's important.

Authors:  E S Holmboe; J Concato
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Nationwide practice patterns for the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Aaron Weinberg; Jason Wright; Christopher Deibert; Yu-Shiang Lu; Dawn Hershman; Alfred Neugut; Benjamin Spencer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.