Literature DB >> 7933233

Expectant management of early stage prostatic cancer: Swedish experience.

J E Johansson1.   

Abstract

To learn about the natural history of untreated early stage prostatic cancer (stage T0-2NXM0) progression-free, disease specific, overall survival and the need for palliative care were evaluated in a population-based and regionally well defined cohort from Sweden. Complete followup, with a mean observation of 12.5 years, was achieved in 223 consecutively diagnosed, eligible patients (98%) of all ages. Patients with progression were hormonally treated (orchiectomy or estrogens) if they had symptoms. After a mean of 12.5 years only 23 patients (10%) had died of prostate cancer and 125 of 148 deaths (84%) were of other causes. The 10-year disease specific survival rate was 85% (95% confidence interval 79 to 91%) and was equally high (89%) in a subgroup of 58 patients who met current indications for radical prostatectomy. The progression-free 10-year survival rate was 55% (95% confidence interval 46 to 63%) but in 49 of 77 patients local growth provided the only evidence of progression and endocrine treatment was generally successful in these cases. Following an initial increase, the rate of disease progression and death from prostate cancer decreased during the last years of followup. The low disease specific mortality rate, especially in patients with highly and moderately differentiated tumors, means that any local or systemic therapy intended for patients with early prostatic cancer must be evaluated in clinical trials with untreated controls for comparison. One such trial is in progress in Sweden and Finland evaluating deferred treatment and radical prostatectomy. As of the beginning of December 1993, 330 patients were included in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7933233     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32378-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 2. Ten potential pitfalls in determining the clinical significance of benefits.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robin Wm Vernooij; Michelle Lancee; Anne Cleves; Philipp Dahm; Chris H Bangma; Katja Kh Aben
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Active surveillance: the Canadian experience with an "inclusive approach".

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  The Gordon Wilson Lecture. Natural history and treatment of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  P T Scardino
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2000

5.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Single foci prostate cancer: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Ioannis Efthimiou; Konstadinos Skrepetis; Elefteria Bournia
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-07-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.