Literature DB >> 7933208

The sensitivity of pressure specific bladder volume versus total bladder capacity as a measure of bladder storage dysfunction.

E H Landau1, B M Churchill, V R Jayanthi, R F Gilmour, R E Steckler, G A McLorie, A E Khoury.   

Abstract

Assessment of bladder storage function requires an accurate measure of bladder capacity and pressure. Pressure specific bladder volume is the volume that a bladder can accommodate at a specific pressure. A total of 21 consecutive children with neurogenic bladders who were candidates for bladder augmentation based on standard clinical criteria (upper urinary tract deterioration, incontinence and infection) was studied to determine the efficacy of pressure specific bladder volume as a measure of bladder dysfunction. Urodynamic indexes were compared to previously established nomograms. All 21 patients had bladder volumes at pressures of 30 cm. water or less, which decreased below the 5th percentile as determined by the nomogram. In 7 patients (33%) normal total bladder capacity was achieved at the expense of elevated storage pressures. Pressure specific bladder volume provides a better measure of bladder storage function than total bladder capacity because it relates volume to intravesical pressure, does not rely on a subjective end point to bladder filling, and is objective and reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7933208     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32479-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Upper and lower urinary tract evaluation of 104 patients with myelomeningocele without adequate urological management.

Authors:  Homero Bruschini; Fernando G Almeida; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  S K Agarwal; D J Bagli
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  [Neurogenic bladder function disorders in patients with meningomyelocele: S2k guidelines on diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  R Stein; C Assion; R Beetz; M Bürst; R Cremer; A Ermert; M Goepel; E Kuwertz-Bröking; B Ludwikowski; T Michael; J Pannek; H Peters; D Rohrmann; I Rübben; A Schröder; R Trollmann; J W Thüroff; W Wagner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Urological problems in patients with meningomyelocele. Diagnostic studies and management].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; R Beetz; A Ermert; D Filipas; M Fisch; M Goepel; I Körner; B Schönberger; C Sparwasser; M Stöhrer; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Pediatric renal transplantation into the abnormal urinary tract.

Authors:  B M Churchill; R V Jayanthi; G A McLorie; A E Khoury
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 6.  Alternatives to conventional enterocystoplasty in children: a critical review of urodynamic outcomes.

Authors:  Ricardo González; Barbara M Ludwikowski
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.