Literature DB >> 7932481

Is the prescription of amphetamine justified as a harm reduction measure?

P M Fleming1, D Roberts.   

Abstract

Although amphetamine is the most widely illicitly used drug in the United Kingdom after cannabis, relatively few problematic users present to treatment agencies. Injecting amphetamine users are a high risk group as far as HIV transmission is concerned. This paper reviews the first 3 years' operation of an oral amphetamine prescribing programme for injecting users. Over half the subjects ceased injecting, and there was a considerable reduction in injecting by the remainder. 85% had not used or shared injecting equipment during the programme. However, subjects reported still using street amphetamine and offending, although at a lower rate than previously. There was little change in sexual practices. There was an increase in primary amphetamine users presenting for treatment. There is a case to be made that closely controlled and monitored programmes such as this can be justified on harm reduction grounds. A number of issues concerned with amphetamine prescribing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7932481     DOI: 10.1177/146642409411400303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Health        ISSN: 0264-0325


  11 in total

1.  Recent developments in maintenance prescribing and monitoring in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Brewer
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1995

2.  Effects of 7-day continuous D-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and cocaine treatment on choice between methamphetamine and food in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Kathryn L Schwienteck; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Comparison of the effects of methamphetamine, bupropion, and methylphenidate on the self-administration of methamphetamine by rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Charles W Schindler; Joanne P Gilman; Leigh V Panlilio; David J McCann; Steven R Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Effects of chronic d-amphetamine administration on the reinforcing strength of cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Paul W Czoty; Jennifer L Martelle; Michael A Nader
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Prolonged attenuation of the reinforcing strength of cocaine by chronic d-amphetamine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Paul W Czoty; Robert W Gould; Jennifer L Martelle; Michael A Nader
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Pharmacotherapy of methamphetamine addiction: an update.

Authors:  Ahmed Elkashef; Frank Vocci; Glen Hanson; Jason White; Wendy Wickes; Jari Tiihonen
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 7.  Biological treatments for amfetamine dependence : recent progress.

Authors:  Kevin P Hill; Mehmet Sofuoglu
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Decreased reinforcing effects of cocaine following 2 weeks of continuous D-amphetamine treatment in rats.

Authors:  Keri A Chiodo; David C S Roberts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Reduction of the reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine by continuous D-amphetamine treatment in rats: importance of active self-administration during treatment period.

Authors:  Benjamin A Zimmer; Keri A Chiodo; David C S Roberts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on cocaine- and food-maintained responding under a progressive-ratio schedule in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Nancy K Mello
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.