Literature DB >> 7931761

Histogram contrast analysis and the visual segregation of IID textures.

C Chubb1, J Econopouly, M S Landy.   

Abstract

A new psychophysical methodology is introduced, histogram contrast analysis, that allows one to measure stimulus transformations, f, used by the visual system to draw distinctions between different image regions. The method involves the discrimination of images constructed by selecting texture micropatterns randomly and independently (across locations) on the basis of a given micropattern histogram. Different components of f are measured by use of different component functions to modulate the micropattern histogram until the resulting textures are discriminable. When no discrimination threshold can be obtained for a given modulating component function, a second titration technique may be used to measure the contribution of that component to f. The method includes several strong tests of its own assumptions. An example is given of the method applied to visual textures composed of small, uniform squares with randomly chosen gray levels. In particular, for a fixed mean gray level mu and a fixed gray-level variance sigma 2, histogram contrast analysis is used to establish that the class S of all textures composed of small squares with jointly independent, identically distributed gray levels with mean mu and variance sigma 2 is perceptually elementary in the following sense: there exists a single, real-valued function f S of gray level, such that two textures I and J in S are discriminable only if the average value of f S applied to the gray levels in I is significantly different from the average value of f S applied to the gray levels in J. Finally, histogram contrast analysis is used to obtain a seventh-order polynomial approximation of f S.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931761     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.11.002350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  15 in total

1.  Local statistics in natural scenes predict the saliency of synthetic textures.

Authors:  Gasper Tkacik; Jason S Prentice; Jonathan D Victor; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Kristin O Michod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual perception: a gloss on surface properties.

Authors:  Michael S Landy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A perceptual space of local image statistics.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Daniel J Thengone; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Responses to second-order texture modulations undergo surround suppression.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte; Charles F Chubb
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  Luminance texture boundaries and luminance step boundaries are segmented using different mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contrast negation and texture synthesis differentially disrupt natural texture appearance.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-20

9.  Minimal models of multidimensional computations.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Fitzgerald; Lawrence C Sincich; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Predicting and Manipulating Cone Responses to Naturalistic Inputs.

Authors:  Juan M Angueyra; Jacob Baudin; Gregory W Schwartz; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.709

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.