Literature DB >> 7930242

Randomized prospective evaluation of prolonged versus abbreviated intravenous heparin therapy after coronary angioplasty.

H Z Friedman1, D R Cragg, S M Glazier, V Gangadharan, D L Marsalese, T L Schreiber, W W O'Neill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the routine use of continuous heparin therapy after successful uncomplicated coronary angioplasty.
BACKGROUND: The use of such therapy varies among institutions and may increase the incidence of complications. Evaluation of the risks and benefits of abbreviated heparin therapy combined with early sheath removal after coronary angioplasty is necessary to determine optimal postprocedure care.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 284 patients who were scheduled for elective coronary angioplasty. Historical, clinical, physiologic and angiographic data were gathered. All patients received an initial bolus of heparin and then were randomized during the procedure to receive either no additional heparin therapy or an adjusted 24-h infusion. On the basis of specific criteria, additional heparin was not withheld if procedural results suggested an increased risk for complications.
RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-eight patients completed the study; 46 others were excluded in the catheterization laboratory because of unfavorable procedural results. The patients with abbreviated (n = 118) and 24-h (n = 120) therapy did not differ with respect to demographic and angiographic findings. However, the former had fewer bleeding complications (0% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) and were discharged earlier (mean +/- SD 23 +/- 11 h vs. 42 +/- 24 h, p < 0.001). One patient in this group had a major complication shortly after angioplasty. The mean savings in hospital charges in the abbreviated therapy group was $1,370 ($6,093 +/- $1,772 vs. $7,463 +/- $1,782, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Omission of routine heparin therapy after successful coronary angioplasty reduces bleeding complications without increasing patient risk. Earlier discharge and significant cost savings are possible under proper conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7930242     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  7 in total

1.  Antithrombotic Therapy during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Antiplatelet therapy in interventional cardiology: II. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Authors:  F H Jafary; C D Kimmelstiel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Safety of low dose heparin in elective coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  K T Koch; J J Piek; R J de Winter; G K David; K Mulder; J G Tijssen; K I Lie
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The economic burden of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kurt M Jacobson; Kirsten Hall Long; Erin K McMurtry; James M Naessens; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-04

5.  Heparin in interventional radiology: a therapy in evolution.

Authors:  Stuart B Resnick; Stephanie H Resnick; Joshua L Weintraub; Nishita Kothary
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Unfractionated versus fractionated heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Heidar Arjomand; Satish K Surabhi; Marc Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jurriën M ten Berg; HW Thijs Plokker; Freek WA Verheugt
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.