OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the outcome of coronary angioplasty according to the various presentations of unstable angina pectoris. BACKGROUND: Although unstable angina is a mosaic of clinical manifestations, a comprehensive analysis of short- and long-term outcome of coronary angioplasty in subsets of unstable angina is not available. METHODS: Data from 15 clinical centers for the 857 patients with unstable angina in the 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty registry were analyzed. Five-year follow-up was available in > 96.5%. Patients were first classified as those with (679 [79%]) or without (178 [21%]) rest angina. Patients were also allocated to five mutually exclusive categories of decreasing unstable angina severity: postinfarction angina, acute coronary insufficiency, plain rest angina, accelerating angina and new onset angina. RESULTS: The group with rest angina had more older patients (p < 0.01) and women (p < 0.001), and a greater proportion had a previous myocardial infarction (p < 0.001) and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 50% (p < 0.01) than did the group without rest angina. Angiographic characteristics were nearly the same, whereas procedural characteristics and outcome were the same for both categories. At 5-year follow-up, there was a higher crude mortality rate in patients with than without rest angina (p < 0.05). Resolution into five subsets yielded additional information. Women were more represented only in the acute coronary insufficiency and plain rest angina subsets (p < 0.001). Patients with angina after myocardial infarction had the second shortest history of angina (p < 0.001), the highest percent of smokers (p < 0.01) and, with those with acute coronary insufficiency, the highest incidence of congestive heart failure (p < 0.05) and an ejection fraction < or = 50% (p < 0.001). They had the highest percent of totally occluded arteries, coronary thrombus and collateral blood flow received but also the lowest rate of severe stenoses (p < 0.001 for all). Patients with new onset angina had the highest prevalence of single-vessel disease (p < 0.05), critical and complex stenoses (p < 0.001) and no coronary angioplasty-related deaths. The crude 5-year mortality rate was higher for both postinfarction and acute insufficiency groups (p < 0.05) than for the other subsets. After adjustments for risk factors, no significant differences in adverse event rates remained among the different unstable angina subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the diverse clinical presentations of unstable angina supports underlying pathogenetic differences. Coronary angioplasty is safe and effective in all subsets of unstable angina. Long-term survival is good in general but is related to the baseline status of left ventricular function.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the outcome of coronary angioplasty according to the various presentations of unstable angina pectoris. BACKGROUND: Although unstable angina is a mosaic of clinical manifestations, a comprehensive analysis of short- and long-term outcome of coronary angioplasty in subsets of unstable angina is not available. METHODS: Data from 15 clinical centers for the 857 patients with unstable angina in the 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty registry were analyzed. Five-year follow-up was available in > 96.5%. Patients were first classified as those with (679 [79%]) or without (178 [21%]) rest angina. Patients were also allocated to five mutually exclusive categories of decreasing unstable angina severity: postinfarction angina, acute coronary insufficiency, plain rest angina, accelerating angina and new onset angina. RESULTS: The group with rest angina had more older patients (p < 0.01) and women (p < 0.001), and a greater proportion had a previous myocardial infarction (p < 0.001) and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 50% (p < 0.01) than did the group without rest angina. Angiographic characteristics were nearly the same, whereas procedural characteristics and outcome were the same for both categories. At 5-year follow-up, there was a higher crude mortality rate in patients with than without rest angina (p < 0.05). Resolution into five subsets yielded additional information. Women were more represented only in the acute coronary insufficiency and plain rest angina subsets (p < 0.001). Patients with angina after myocardial infarction had the second shortest history of angina (p < 0.001), the highest percent of smokers (p < 0.01) and, with those with acute coronary insufficiency, the highest incidence of congestive heart failure (p < 0.05) and an ejection fraction < or = 50% (p < 0.001). They had the highest percent of totally occluded arteries, coronary thrombus and collateral blood flow received but also the lowest rate of severe stenoses (p < 0.001 for all). Patients with new onset angina had the highest prevalence of single-vessel disease (p < 0.05), critical and complex stenoses (p < 0.001) and no coronary angioplasty-related deaths. The crude 5-year mortality rate was higher for both postinfarction and acute insufficiency groups (p < 0.05) than for the other subsets. After adjustments for risk factors, no significant differences in adverse event rates remained among the different unstable angina subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the diverse clinical presentations of unstable angina supports underlying pathogenetic differences. Coronary angioplasty is safe and effective in all subsets of unstable angina. Long-term survival is good in general but is related to the baseline status of left ventricular function.