Literature DB >> 7930147

The rationale for the use of risk calculators in pressure sore prevention, and the evidence of the reliability and validity of published scales.

M Edwards1.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown an increase in pressure sore prevalence rates. However, methodological inconsistencies and demographic considerations, which include an ageing population, make it difficult to interpret and compare results. A multiplicity of intrinsic and extrinsic factors are thought to be associated with increased risk. The development of risk calculators which incorporate these factors has been an attempt to identify which subjects are most at risk so that equipment and nursing interventions can be allocated appropriately. Since the 1960s there has been a proliferation of risk assessment scales which have not been subjected to rigorous scrutiny of their reliability and validity, and this is held to represent a failure of nursing research. Recent evidence suggests that if critical cut-off points for 'at-risk' vs. 'no risk' are adjusted for particular patient populations the validity of existing scales can be improved. Missing from the literature are research reports of studies carried out in the community. As a result of demographic changes and community care policies, more 'at-risk' patients are likely to be nursed at home. Future research needs to include community studies, and a more systematic approach in general, to the study of the predictive value of existing scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7930147     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20020288.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Lisette Schoonhoven; Jeen R E Haalboom; Mente T Bousema; Ale Algra; Diederick E Grobbee; Maria H Grypdonck; Erik Buskens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-12

2.  Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment.

Authors:  L Schoonhoven; D E Grobbee; A R T Donders; A Algra; M H Grypdonck; M T Bousema; A J P Schrijvers; E Buskens
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-02

3.  Hip fracture and pressure ulcers - the Pan-European Pressure Ulcer Study - intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors.

Authors:  Christina Lindholm; Eila Sterner; Marco Romanelli; Elaine Pina; Joan Torra y Bou; Helvi Hietanen; Ansa Iivanainen; Lena Gunningberg; Ami Hommel; Birgitta Klang; Carol Dealey
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The clinical relevance of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale in the ICU.

Authors:  J T Weststrate; W C Hop; A G Aalbers; A W Vreeling; H A Bruining
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Prophylactic use of donut-shaped cushion to reduce sacral pressure injuries during open heart surgery.

Authors:  Min Hee Heo; Ji Yeon Kim; Beom Il Park; Sang Il Lee; Kyung-Tae Kim; Jang Su Park; Won Joo Choe; Jun Hyun Kim
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-01-04

6.  Surgical Treatment of 55 Patients with Pressure Ulcers at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Kosovo during the Period 2000-2010: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shkelzen B Duci; Hysni M Arifi; Mimoza E Selmani; Agon Y Mekaj; Musli M Gashi; Zejn A Buja; Vildane H Ismajli; Adem N Kllokoqi; Enver T Hoxha
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2013-02-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.