Literature DB >> 7929868

Effects of 100 mg of controlled-release metoprolol and 100 mg of atenolol on blood pressure, central nervous system-related symptoms, and general well being.

P O Walle1, G Westergren, E Dimenäs, B Olofsson, T Albrektsen.   

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS)-related symptoms and quality of life during treatment with controlled-release (CR) metoprolol and a standard formulation of atenolol were compared in a double-blind crossover study in 60 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, each beta 1-adrenoceptor blocker was administered at a dosage of 100 mg once daily for 6 weeks. Quality of life was assessed regularly during the active treatment phases by use of two standardized self-administered questionnaires, the minor symptom evaluation (MSE) profile, and the psychologic general well-being (PGWB) index. Both questionnaires have previously been shown to be effective in detecting CNS symptoms and changes in well being produced by beta-blockers. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of the two drugs. Metoprolol CR and atenolol produced equivalent, clinically effective reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures measured 24 hours after administration. The drugs were found to exert similar effects on general well being, as assessed by the PGWB index, and there were no significant differences between the two treatments with regard to the three dimensions of the MSE profile, contentment, vitality, and sleep. Thus, at equivalent antihypertensive dosages, metoprolol CR and atenolol are clinically comparable with regard to the degree of CNS-related symptoms produced and effects on general well being. Because these agents differ markedly in lipophilicity, other factors, such as beta 1-selectivity/nonselectivity, may be more important determinants of whether these subjective symptoms occur during therapy with beta-blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7929868     DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb02034.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  6 in total

Review 1.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.

Authors:  I Côté; J P Grégoire; J Moisan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Evaluating the psychometric characteristics of the Psychological General Well-Being Index with a new response scale.

Authors:  D A Revicki; N K Leidy; L Howland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Development and validation of the short version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB-S).

Authors:  Enzo Grossi; Nicola Groth; Paola Mosconi; Renata Cerutti; Fabio Pace; Angelo Compare; Giovanni Apolone
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Dose-independent influence of metoprolol on cardiac and motor functions, QoL, and mental status in Chinese patients with CHF.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Qiuhong Shu; Liyong Wu; Ran Zhang; Yong Meng
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Influence of Formulation Factors and Compression Force on Release Profile of Sustained Release Metoprolol Tablets using Compritol(®) 888ATO as Lipid Excipient.

Authors:  Shilpa N Patere; Chhanda J Kapadia; Mangal S Nagarsenker
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.975

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.