Literature DB >> 7929732

Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates.

A Strandell1, U Waldenström, L Nilsson, L Hamberger.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was designed to examine whether the presence of a hydrosalpinx influenced pregnancy outcome following in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in stimulated cycles. A total of 254 women with tubal lesions were included. Patients with one or two hydrosalpinges were compared with patients having other tubal lesions and pregnancy outcome was analysed. Both pregnancy and delivery rates were significantly higher in the patient group without a hydrosalpinx. The results after frozen embryo transfer showed the same tendency. These findings strongly indicate that a permanent hydrosalpinx has a negative influence on implantation, as well as on pregnancy, and suggest that a more active approach against large hydrosalpinges should be undertaken before IVF treatment, in order to improve the pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7929732     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  29 in total

1.  The effect of hydrosalpinges on IVF-ET outcome.

Authors:  L I Barmat; E Rauch; S Spandorfer; A Kowalik; E S Sills; G Schattman; H C Liu; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation adversely affects implantation following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  J H Check; J K Choe; D Katsoff; D Summers-Chase; C Wilson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  How members of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Society of Reproductive Surgeons evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges.

Authors:  Kenan Omurtag; Natalia M Grindler; Kimberly A Roehl; Gordon Wright Bates; Angeline N Beltsos; Randall R Odem; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Mild ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Jerome H Check
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Salpingectomy for repeated embryo nonimplantation after in vitro fertilization in patients with severe tubal factor infertility.

Authors:  H Dechaud; T Anahory; N Aligier; F Arnal; H Humeau; B Hedon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effects of hydrosalpinx on ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation measured by power color Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Fang Cheng; Tao Li; Qing-Li Wang; Hui-Li Zhou; Li Duan; Xia Cai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  The presence of hydrosalpinx may not adversely affect the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  E H Ng; W S Yeung; P C Ho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  An increased number of replaced embryos counteracts the adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on IVF/ET outcome.

Authors:  K H Abd-el-Maeboud; E al-Dein M Khalifa; E S el-Hussein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Transformation of Chlamydia muridarum reveals a role for Pgp5 in suppression of plasmid-dependent gene expression.

Authors:  Yuanjun Liu; Chaoqun Chen; Siqi Gong; Shuping Hou; Manli Qi; Quanzhong Liu; Joel Baseman; Guangming Zhong
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; Sabine van Voorst; Martin C Sowter; Annika Strandell; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.