PURPOSE: Prospective evaluation of the toxicity and efficacy of radiosurgery with external beam radiotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 5/89 to 12/92, 31 out of 51 patients with glioblastoma multiforme underwent radiosurgery, in addition to 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy/fraction following biopsy (n = 12) or resection (n = 19). Eligibility required supratentorial glioblastoma, tumor not > 4 cm in > 1 axis, age > 18 years, and location > 1 cm from optic chiasm. Patient characteristics were: age 20-78 years (median = 57); 22 male, 9 female; Karnofsky score 20-90 (m = 70), and volume of 2.3-59.7 c.c. (m = 17.4). Eighteen patients were treated with 1 collimator, 5 with 2, 7 with 3, and 1 with 4; peripheral isodoses were 40-90% (m = 72.5) and minimum and maximum tumor dose ranges were 10-20 (m = 12) and 15-35 Gy (m = 18.75). Patients were followed clinically and radiographically every 8-12 weeks to analyze survival, quality of life, and toxicity. RESULTS: With a follow-up of 12-171 weeks, 8 out of 31 (26%) patients are alive. Median survival is 42 weeks. Twelve and 24-month actuarial survival are 38 and 28%. Comparison of the 2-year survival with previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group patients was carried out using a nonparametric recursive partitioning technique and the observed vs. expected values are 28 vs. 9.7% (p < 0.05). Extent of resection and performance status were associated with improved survival in a multivariate analysis. No significant acute toxicity was encountered. Four patients (13%) developed clinically significant necrosis verified by biopsy or positron emission tomography scan at 9-59 weeks after radiosurgery. CONCLUSION: The improvement in median survival in broadly selected glioblastoma patients treated with radiosurgery is difficult to determine, but the 2-year survival may be superior. Future randomized trials of radiosurgery are recommended, and ad hoc use of this modality should be discouraged.
PURPOSE: Prospective evaluation of the toxicity and efficacy of radiosurgery with external beam radiotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 5/89 to 12/92, 31 out of 51 patients with glioblastoma multiforme underwent radiosurgery, in addition to 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy/fraction following biopsy (n = 12) or resection (n = 19). Eligibility required supratentorial glioblastoma, tumor not > 4 cm in > 1 axis, age > 18 years, and location > 1 cm from optic chiasm. Patient characteristics were: age 20-78 years (median = 57); 22 male, 9 female; Karnofsky score 20-90 (m = 70), and volume of 2.3-59.7 c.c. (m = 17.4). Eighteen patients were treated with 1 collimator, 5 with 2, 7 with 3, and 1 with 4; peripheral isodoses were 40-90% (m = 72.5) and minimum and maximum tumor dose ranges were 10-20 (m = 12) and 15-35 Gy (m = 18.75). Patients were followed clinically and radiographically every 8-12 weeks to analyze survival, quality of life, and toxicity. RESULTS: With a follow-up of 12-171 weeks, 8 out of 31 (26%) patients are alive. Median survival is 42 weeks. Twelve and 24-month actuarial survival are 38 and 28%. Comparison of the 2-year survival with previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group patients was carried out using a nonparametric recursive partitioning technique and the observed vs. expected values are 28 vs. 9.7% (p < 0.05). Extent of resection and performance status were associated with improved survival in a multivariate analysis. No significant acute toxicity was encountered. Four patients (13%) developed clinically significant necrosis verified by biopsy or positron emission tomography scan at 9-59 weeks after radiosurgery. CONCLUSION: The improvement in median survival in broadly selected glioblastomapatients treated with radiosurgery is difficult to determine, but the 2-year survival may be superior. Future randomized trials of radiosurgery are recommended, and ad hoc use of this modality should be discouraged.
Authors: Dwight E Heron; Karen D Godette; Ray A Wynn; V Elayne Arterbery; Oscar A Streeter; Mack Roach; Joseph R Simpson; Melissa Blough; Charles R Thomas Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: John Buatti; Timothy C Ryken; Mark C Smith; Penny Sneed; John H Suh; Minesh Mehta; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Shannon E Fogh; David W Andrews; Jon Glass; Walter Curran; Charles Glass; Colin Champ; James J Evans; Terry Hyslop; Edward Pequignot; Beverly Downes; Eileen Comber; Mitchell Maltenfort; Adam P Dicker; Maria Werner-Wasik Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Douglas B Einstein; Barry Wessels; Barbara Bangert; Pingfu Fu; A Dennis Nelson; Mark Cohen; Stephen Sagar; Jonathan Lewin; Andrew Sloan; Yiran Zheng; Jordonna Williams; Valdir Colussi; Robert Vinkler; Robert Maciunas Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christopher J Anker; Richard V Hymas; Lisa J Hazard; Kenneth M Boucher; Randy L Jensen; Dennis C Shrieve Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-04-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: J Dawn Waters; Brent Rose; David D Gonda; Daniel J Scanderbeg; Michelle Russell; John F Alksne; Kevin Murphy; Bob S Carter; Joshua Lawson; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.130