Literature DB >> 7927750

Vaccination of chickens with strain CVL30, a genetically defined Salmonella enteritidis aroA live oral vaccine candidate.

G L Cooper1, L M Venables, M J Woodward, C E Hormaeche.   

Abstract

Newly hatched chicks were vaccinated orally with a genetically defined Salmonella enteritidis aroA candidate, strain CVL30. In chickens immunized with 10(5) or 10(9) CFU and challenged by the intravenous route with 10(8) CFU of S. enteritidis 109 Nalr at 8 weeks old, there were similar reductions in colonization of the spleens, livers, and ceca of vaccinees compared with unvaccinated controls. Two groups of newly hatched female chicks were vaccinated orally with 10(9) CFU of strain CVL30, and one group was revaccinated intramuscularly with 10(9) CFU at 16 weeks old. When challenged intravenously with S. enteritidis 109 Nalr at 23 weeks old, there was a reduction in the colonization of spleens, livers, ovaries, and ceca compared with unvaccinated controls. Inclusion of the intramuscular booster gave increased protection to the ovary, although the vaccine strain was isolated on one occasion from a batch of eggs laid at 20 weeks old. In chickens immunized with 10(9) CFU of strain CVL30 and challenged orally with 10(9) CFU of S. enteritidis 109 Nalr, there was a reduction in intestinal shedding of the challenge strain from vaccines compared with unvaccinated controls. Circulating immunoglobulin G antibodies to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were detected in unvaccinated controls within 7 to 10 days of oral challenge. In contrast, circulating immunoglobulin G antibodies to LPS in vaccinees were not altered by the oral challenge, which suggested that vaccination reduced or prevented invasion by the challenge strain from the gut or multiplication of the challenge strain in the tissues. Newly hatched chicks were vaccinated orally with ca. 10(9) CFU of strain CVL30, and 1 day later, the vaccines and unvaccinated controls were challenged orally with 10(5) or 10(9) CFU of S. enteritidis 109 Nalr. Colonization of the ceca and invasion from the gut by the S. enteritidis challenge strain was reduced in the vaccines up to 5 days postchallenge compared with controls. In a second trial, vaccinees and controls were challenged orally with 10(7) or 10(9) CFU of S. typhimurium 2391 Nalr. In contrast to the challenge with S. enteritidis, colonization of the ceca and invasion by the S. typhimurium strain were not greatly reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7927750      PMCID: PMC303182          DOI: 10.1128/iai.62.11.4747-4754.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  31 in total

1.  Salmonella enteritidis in a commercial layer flock.

Authors:  S A Hopper; S Mawer
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1988-09-24       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Salmonella enteritidis infection in broilers and broiler breeders.

Authors:  S A Lister
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1988-09-24       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR.

Authors:  V L Miller; J J Mekalanos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Construction and characterization of vaccine strains of Salmonella harboring mutations in two different aro genes.

Authors:  G Dougan; S Chatfield; D Pickard; J Bester; D O'Callaghan; D Maskell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Characterization of porin and ompR mutants of a virulent strain of Salmonella typhimurium: ompR mutants are attenuated in vivo.

Authors:  C J Dorman; S Chatfield; C F Higgins; C Hayward; G Dougan
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  An outbreak of infection with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 associated with the use of raw shell eggs.

Authors:  D J Irwin; M Rao; D W Barham; D C Pencheon; C Lofts; P H Jones; M O'Mahony; N Soltanpoor; L R Ward; E J Threlfall
Journal:  Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev       Date:  1993-12-03

7.  Further studies of the application of live Salmonella enteritidis aroA vaccines in chickens.

Authors:  G L Cooper; L M Venables; R A Nicholas; G A Cullen; C E Hormaeche
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1993-07-10       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 8.  The development of oral vaccines based on live attenuated Salmonella strains.

Authors:  S Chatfield; M Roberts; P Londono; I Cropley; G Douce; G Dougan
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  1993-06

Review 9.  Auxotrophic Salmonella typhi as live vaccine.

Authors:  B A Stocker
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Aromatic-dependent Salmonella dublin as a parenteral modified live vaccine for calves.

Authors:  B P Smith; M Reina-Guerra; B A Stocker; S K Hoiseth; E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.156

View more
  12 in total

1.  aro mutations in Salmonella enterica cause defects in cell wall and outer membrane integrity.

Authors:  Alena Sebkova; Daniela Karasova; Magdalena Crhanova; Eva Budinska; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Evaluation of oral, subcutaneous, and nasal administration of Salmonella enteritidis-immune lymphokines on the potentiation of a protective heterophilic inflammatory response to Salmonella enteritidis in day-old chickens.

Authors:  M H Kogut; K Genovese; R B Moyes; L H Stanker
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium elicits cross-immunity against a Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis strain expressing LP fimbriae from the lac promoter.

Authors:  T L Nicholson; A J Bäumler
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Salmonella DNA adenine methylase mutants elicit protective immune responses to homologous and heterologous serovars in chickens.

Authors:  E L Dueger; J K House; D M Heithoff; M J Mahan
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Attenuation of and protection induced by a leucine auxotroph of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  M K Hondalus; S Bardarov; R Russell; J Chan; W R Jacobs; B R Bloom
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Invasiveness and persistence of Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, and a genetically defined S. enteritidis aroA strain in young chickens.

Authors:  G L Cooper; L M Venables; M J Woodward; C E Hormaeche
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Competitive exclusion of Salmonella enteritidis by Salmonella gallinarum in poultry.

Authors:  W Rabsch; B M Hargis; R M Tsolis; R A Kingsley; K H Hinz; H Tschäpe; A J Bäumler
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Oral infection with the Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum 9R attenuated live vaccine as a model to characterise immunity to fowl typhoid in the chicken.

Authors:  Paul Wigley; Scott Hulme; Claire Powers; Richard Beal; Adrian Smith; Paul Barrow
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Attenuating gene expression (AGE) for vaccine development.

Authors:  David W Pascual; Zhiyong Suo; Ling Cao; Recep Avci; Xinghong Yang
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.882

10.  Composition of Gut Microbiota Influences Resistance of Newly Hatched Chickens to Salmonella Enteritidis Infection.

Authors:  Karolina Varmuzova; Tereza Kubasova; Lenka Davidova-Gerzova; Frantisek Sisak; Hana Havlickova; Alena Sebkova; Marcela Faldynova; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.