Literature DB >> 7924715

Intraluminal bypass technique using a condom for protection of coloanal anastomosis.

W H Yoon1, I S Song, E S Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most surgeons carry out temporary diverting colostomy in coloanal anastomosis for mid-rectal or lower-rectal carcinomas. It has been reported that proximal fecal diversion provides no guarantee against anastomotic leaks. Some have proposed the use of the intracolonic bypass tube to prevent anastomotic leakage and colostomy, but colonic necrosis has been reported; it is important to use a safe technique that obviates this.
METHODS: The rectum is fully mobilized and transected at the level of the levator diaphragm. The mobilized sigmoid and rectum are resected with their mesenteries, and the prepared distal colon is everted 5 cm using Babcock clamps. The ring of a sterilized condom is then sutured to the mucosa and submucosa of the colon with 4/0 chromic catgut sutures. After completion of coloanal anastomosis, the condom is brought to the exterior, and the mid part is transected.
RESULTS: We have used a condom for intraluminal bypass procedures in ten rectal carcinoma patients including five preoperative radiation cases. There was no anastomotic dehiscence, leakage, or colonic necrosis because of a condom.
CONCLUSION: We believe that the intraluminal bypass technique using a condom is a very safe, cost-effective, and easily available alternative for coloanal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924715     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

Review 1.  Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Protection of colorectal anastomosis with an intraluminal bypass device for patients undergoing an elective anterior resection: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Reshef; G Ben-Arie; I Pinsk
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Liang Xiao; Wen-bo Zhang; Peng-cheng Jiang; Xue-feng Bu; Qun Yan; Hua Li; Yong-jun Zhang; Feng Yu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Could Stoma Be Avoided after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer? Experience with Transanal Tube in 195 Cases.

Authors:  Antonio Sciuto; Roberto Peltrini; Federica Andreoli; Andrea Gianmario Di Santo Albini; Maria Michela Di Nuzzo; Nello Pirozzi; Marcello Filotico; Federica Lauria; Giuseppe Boccia; Michele D'Ambra; Ruggero Lionetti; Carlo De Werra; Felice Pirozzi; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The pull-through: back to the future.

Authors:  F Prete; F P Prete
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

6.  Long-term fecal diverting device for the prevention of sepsis in case of colorectal anastomotic leakage: an animal experiment.

Authors:  Jae Hwang Kim; Sang Hun Jung; Yong-Jin Kim; Se-Ll Park; Dae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Transanal drainage tube reduces rate and severity of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal anastomosis: A case controlled study.

Authors:  A Brandl; S Czipin; R Mittermair; S Weiss; J Pratschke; R Kafka-Ritsch
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-12

8.  Use of Valtrac™-secured intracolonic bypass in laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Dong Chen; Danyang Wang; Jianjiang Lin; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The C-seal trial: colorectal anastomosis protected by a biodegradable drain fixed to the anastomosis by a circular stapler, a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ilsalien S Bakker; Annelien N Morks; Henk O Ten Cate Hoedemaker; Johannes G M Burgerhof; Henri G Leuvenink; Rutger J Ploeg; Klaas Havenga
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Fecal diverting device for the substitution of defunctioning stoma: preliminary clinical study.

Authors:  Jae Hwang Kim; Sohyun Kim; Sang Hun Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.