Literature DB >> 7924220

A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States.

K E Aldridge1, M Gelfand, L B Reller, L W Ayers, C L Pierson, F Schoenknecht, R C Tilton, J Wilkins, A Henderberg, D D Schiro.   

Abstract

Over 2800 clinical strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were collected during a 5-year period from ten geographically separate sites and tested for their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents using a broth microdilution method. Among the cephalosporins, ceftizoxime was the most active (13% resistance) and importantly exhibited relatively equal activity against both B. fragilis species and non-B. fragilis species. Cefotaxime exhibited similar activity with an overall resistance rate of 18%. Both ceftriaxone and cefoperazone were appreciably less active cephalosporins especially against non-B. fragilis species. With regard to cephamycins, cefoxitin (MIC90, 32 micrograms/ml) was more active than cefotetan (MIC90, > or = 256 micrograms/ml) and cefmetazole (MIC90, 64 micrograms/ml). Non-B. fragilis species were highly resistant to cefotetan and cefmetazole. Imipenem was highly active against all strains with the exception of four strains of B. fragilis. Ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam were all highly active with resistance rates < 2%. No resistance was detected to metronidazole, whereas 14% of isolates were resistant to clindamycin. When compared with other studies, these findings underscore the wide variability in susceptibility patterns reported nationwide and the need to continue monitoring these patterns to aid in choosing the most active compounds for therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924220     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90026-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of the in vitro activities of Bay 12-8039, a new quinolone, and other antimicrobials against clinically important anaerobes.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; D S Ashcraft
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro susceptibilities of the Bacteroides fragilis group species: change in isolation rates significantly affects overall susceptibility data.

Authors:  Kenneth E Aldridge; Megan O'Brien
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Authors:  C M Perry; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Multicenter survey of the changing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, and Peptostreptococcus species.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; D Ashcraft; K Cambre; C L Pierson; S G Jenkins; J E Rosenblatt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activities of MK-0826 and 16 other antimicrobials against Bacteroides fragilis group strains.

Authors:  C Betriu; A Sánchez; M L Palau; M Gómez; J J Picazo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Activities of new antimicrobial agents (trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, sanfetrinem, and quinupristin-dalfopristin) against Bacteroides fragilis group: comparison with the activities of 14 other agents.

Authors:  C Betriu; M Gómez; M L Palau; A Sánchez; J J Picazo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Cefotaxime. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and a review of its therapeutic efficacy when administered twice daily for the treatment of mild to moderate infections.

Authors:  R N Brogden; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Metronidazole. A therapeutic review and update.

Authors:  C D Freeman; N E Klutman; K C Lamp
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Bacteremia due to Bacteroides fragilis group: distribution of species, beta-lactamase production, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Authors:  Kenneth E Aldridge; Deborah Ashcraft; Megan O'Brien; Charles V Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.