Literature DB >> 7924204

Detection of group B Streptococcus. Comparison of solid and liquid culture media with and without selective antibiotics.

S S Altaie1, D Dryja.   

Abstract

A total of 952 consecutive vaginal swabs were obtained from patients who attended obstetric or gynecologic clinics affiliated with the Children's Hospital of Buffalo, New York. Swabs were cultured comparatively on 5% sheep blood agar (BA), selective sheep blood agar containing 1.25 micrograms/ml trimethoprim-23.75 micrograms/ml sulfamethoxazole (SXT), and Lim broth (Todd-Hewitt broth containing 1% yeast extract, 10 micrograms/ml colistin, and 15 micrograms/ml nalidixic acid). A total of 168 swabs (18%) were positive (by at least one method) for group B Streptococcus (GBS). The overall agreement among the three techniques was 90% (858 of 952); 94 specimens (10%, 94 of 952) had discrepant results, and 74 of these (44%, 74 of 168) were positive, only by Lim as opposed to two (1%) and 0 by BA and SXT, respectively. There were only two (2%, 2 of 168) false negative for Lim as compared with 82 (49%) for BA and 86 (51%) for SXT. Thus, the sensitivity of GBS detection by BA, SXT, and Lim is 51%, 49%, and 99%, respectively. These data suggest that the use of Lim broth increases the recovery rate of GBS by 48% after 48 h while the use of the SXT plate reduced the recovery rate by 2% as compared with the conventional BA plate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924204     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90082-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Granada agar plate for detection of vaginal and rectal group B streptococci in pregnant women.

Authors:  E G Gil; M C Rodríguez; R Bartolomé; B Berjano; L Cabero; A Andreu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Culture-based method with performance comparable to that of PCR-based methods for detection of group B Streptococcus in screening samples from pregnant women.

Authors:  Benjamin R Berg; Jeana L Houseman; Michelle A Garrasi; Carol L Young; Duane W Newton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of a modified DNA hybridization assay with standard culture enrichment for detecting group B streptococci in obstetric patients.

Authors:  S M Kircher; M P Meyer; J A Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Epidemiology of group B streptococcal disease in the United States: shifting paradigms.

Authors:  A Schuchat
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Development of a Novel Test for Simultaneous Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility.

Authors:  Jonathan Faro; Malika Mitchell; Yuh-Jue Chen; Sarah Kamal; Gerald Riddle; Sebastian Faro
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-30

6.  Antimicrobial Surveillance for Bacterial Uropathogens in Ha'il, Saudi Arabia: A Five-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman S Bazaid; Amir Saeed; Abdulaziz Alrashidi; Abdulkarim Alrashidi; Khalid Alshaghdali; Sahar A Hammam; Talal Alreshidi; Munif Alshammary; Abdullah Alarfaj; Rawan Thallab; Abdu Aldarhami
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Screening protocols for group B streptococcus: are transport media appropriate?

Authors:  Nicolette Teese; Daneeta Henessey; Christopher Pearce; Nigel Kelly; Suzanne Garland
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.