Literature DB >> 7924049

Imaging techniques for glenohumeral arthritis and glenohumeral arthroplasty.

A Green1, T R Norris.   

Abstract

A thorough history and physical examination can usually determine the cause of a painful shoulder. In most cases, the diagnosis and cause of glenohumeral arthritis are fairly obvious. Imaging studies such as radiographs, computed tomography (CT), arthrography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are used to confirm and further define the pathologic process. Early in the development of glenohumeral arthrosis, subtle radiographic findings may suggest the diagnosis when the symptoms are mild. Later in the progression of joint destruction, imaging studies are crucial to the planning of prosthetic arthroplasty. Subsequent to arthroplasty, imaging studies can identify existing or potential problems that might correlate with the clinical course. Recent advances in musculoskeletal imaging, such as CT, ultrasound, and MR imaging, enable the physician to confirm or document anatomic pathology that was previously only inferred. There has been a corresponding increase in the use of imaging modalities. Concurrently, cost has become a major concern, and its limitation or reduction a priority of current and future medical care. Consequently, the knowledge gained from further research, education, and clinical experience must promote appropriate use and enable doctors to avoid sophisticated imaging when the results will not influence the course of treatment. The radiographic evaluation of glenohumeral arthrosis the use of imaging techniques in planning prosthetic glenohumeral arthroplasty, and the role of imaging in followup evaluations of prosthetic arthroplasty are discussed. The preferred approaches to these subjects are presented and clinical cases are used to highlight the important and interesting principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  5 in total

1.  Is tennis a predisposing factor for degenerative shoulder disease? A controlled study in former elite players.

Authors:  J Maquirriain; J P Ghisi; S Amato
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Surgical management of the biconcave (B2) glenoid.

Authors:  Kenneth W Donohue; Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Bone destruction, upward migration, and medialisation of rheumatoid shoulder: a 15 year follow up study.

Authors:  J T Lehtinen; E A Belt; M J Kauppi; K Kaarela; P P Kuusela; H J Kautiainen; M U Lehto
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Blinded Ultrasound Examination of the Subscapularis Following Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael P O'Malley; Cameron Kia; Alex G Dukas; Mark Cote; Harlan Stock; Lawrence Savoy; Brian A Tinsley; Farhang Alaee; Augustus D Mazzocca; Kevin P Shea
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.