Literature DB >> 7923691

Class III antiarrhythmic drug action in experimental atrial fibrillation. Differences in reverse use dependence and effectiveness between d-sotalol and the new antiarrhythmic drug ambasilide.

J Wang1, J Feng, S Nattel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug therapy to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by adverse effects and inadequate efficacy. There has been an increased interest in the use of class III drugs to treat AF, and several new agents have been developed, but there is little information available about mechanisms of class III drug action in AF. The present study was designed to compare the effects of two class III agents, d-sotalol and ambasilide, in dog models of experimental AF. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A previously developed dog model of sustained vagotonic AF was used to assess the ability of equal loading doses of d-sotalol and ambasilide (2 mg/kg, followed by maintenance infusions), to terminate AF and prevent its induction. At this dose, ambasilide terminated AF in 12 of 12 dogs and prevented AF induction in 10 of 12 dogs; d-sotalol terminated AF in 1 of 8 dogs (P = .001 versus ambasilide) and prevented AF induction in none of 8 dogs (P = .002). An additional dose of d-sotalol (cumulative load, 8 mg/kg) terminated AF in 7 of 8 dogs and prevented induction in 5 of 8 dogs. In an additional 6 dogs with sterile pericarditis and inducible AF, ambasilide prevented AF induction in all 6. An equal dose of d-sotalol (2 mg/kg) failed to suppress AF induction in any dog, but 8 mg/kg of d-sotalol suppressed AF induction in all. Atrial effective refractory period (AERP) was increased by both drugs. However, the effects of d-sotalol on AERP showed strong reverse use dependence, whereas those of ambasilide did not. Neither ambasilide nor d-sotalol significantly altered conduction velocity, and both increased ventricular refractoriness, with d-sotalol once again showing more reverse use dependence. Effective doses of both agents increased AERP and the wavelength for atrial reentry at rapid rates, slowing atrial activation and terminating the arrhythmia.
CONCLUSIONS: The class III drugs d-sotalol and ambasilide terminate AF by increasing AERP and the wavelength for reentry. Ambasilide, which has been reported to block both the rapid and slow components of the delayed rectifier (IKr and IKs), shows less reverse use dependence of effects on refractoriness than the pure IKr blocker d-sotalol, possibly explaining the greater effectiveness of ambasilide at an equal dose level. These results indicate that class III drugs can exhibit different profiles of rate-dependent action on AERP and suggest that it may be possible to develop agents that have more desirable rate-dependent profiles than pure blockers of Ikr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7923691     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.2032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  15 in total

Review 1.  The impact of recent ion channel science on the development and use of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  M N Langan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  New developments in atrial antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Pharmacologic enhancement of atrial electrical defibrillation efficacy: role of ibutilide.

Authors:  D S Khoury; M D Assar; H Sun
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Novel pharmacological targets for the rhythm control management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  Frequency-dependent electrophysiological effect of ibutilide on human atrium and ventricle.

Authors:  N Oshikawa; I Watanabe; R Masaki; A Shindo; T Kojima; S Saito; Y Ozawa; K Kanmatsuse
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  How Do Atrial-Selective Drugs Differ From Antiarrhythmic Drugs Currently Used in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2008

7.  Effects of the class III antiarrhythmic drug ambasilide on outward currents in human atrial myocytes.

Authors:  B Koidl; P Flaschberger; P Schaffer; B Pelzmann; E Bernhart; H Mächler; B Rigler
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Effects of the chromanol HMR 1556 on potassium currents in atrial myocytes.

Authors:  Ralph F Bosch; Alexander C Schneck; Saskia Csillag; Bernd Eigenberger; Uwe Gerlach; Joachim Brendel; Hans J Lang; Christian Mewis; Heinz Gögelein; Ludger Seipel; Volker Kühlkamp
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  Is there a future for antiarrhythmic drug therapy?

Authors:  P G Guerra; M Talajic; D Roy; M Dubuc; B Thibault; S Nattel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  New pharmacological strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.