BACKGROUND: Evaluation of regional aortic elastic properties in humans has been hampered by the need for invasive techniques to access instantaneous aortic pressure, wall thickness, and cross-sectional area or diameter. In this study, a new noninvasive method is presented for quantification of regional aortic elastic properties. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were studied during transesophageal echocardiographic procedures. Measurements of instantaneous aortic cross-sectional area were obtained with an automated border detection algorithm applied to short-axis transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiographic images of the proximal descending thoracic aorta. Instantaneous aortic wall thickness was derived from combined two-dimensional targeted M-mode end-diastolic wall thickness and instantaneous aortic area measurements. Instantaneous aortic pressures were estimated from calibrated subclavian pulse tracings recorded simultaneously. Data were digitized to generate aortic area-pressure loops. Regional aortic mechanical properties were quantified in terms of compliance per unit length (C is the slope of the area-pressure regression), aortic midwall radius (Rm), and incremental elastic modulus of the aortic wall (Einc). To assess the independent effect of age, Rm and Einc values were compared at a common level of aortic midwall stress (0.666 x 10(6) dynes/cm2). Mean values (+/- SD) for C, Rm, and Einc were 0.01 +/- 0.004 cm2/mm Hg, 1.14 +/- 0.17 cm, and 7.059 +/- 4.091 x 10(6) dynes/cm2, respectively. An inverse linear correlation was found between aortic compliance per unit length and age (r = -.68, P < .0007). Incremental elastic modulus was related to age (r = +.80, P < .00003) in a nonlinear fashion such that it increased sharply after the age of 60 years. Finally, midwall radius was less tightly correlated with age (r = +.45, P < .05). Values for C, Rm, and Einc as well as the age dependency of these properties are similar to those reported previously when invasive techniques were used. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology constitutes a new tool to improve the clinical evaluation of regional aortic elastic properties in multiple disease states.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of regional aortic elastic properties in humans has been hampered by the need for invasive techniques to access instantaneous aortic pressure, wall thickness, and cross-sectional area or diameter. In this study, a new noninvasive method is presented for quantification of regional aortic elastic properties. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were studied during transesophageal echocardiographic procedures. Measurements of instantaneous aortic cross-sectional area were obtained with an automated border detection algorithm applied to short-axis transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiographic images of the proximal descending thoracic aorta. Instantaneous aortic wall thickness was derived from combined two-dimensional targeted M-mode end-diastolic wall thickness and instantaneous aortic area measurements. Instantaneous aortic pressures were estimated from calibrated subclavian pulse tracings recorded simultaneously. Data were digitized to generate aortic area-pressure loops. Regional aortic mechanical properties were quantified in terms of compliance per unit length (C is the slope of the area-pressure regression), aortic midwall radius (Rm), and incremental elastic modulus of the aortic wall (Einc). To assess the independent effect of age, Rm and Einc values were compared at a common level of aortic midwall stress (0.666 x 10(6) dynes/cm2). Mean values (+/- SD) for C, Rm, and Einc were 0.01 +/- 0.004 cm2/mm Hg, 1.14 +/- 0.17 cm, and 7.059 +/- 4.091 x 10(6) dynes/cm2, respectively. An inverse linear correlation was found between aortic compliance per unit length and age (r = -.68, P < .0007). Incremental elastic modulus was related to age (r = +.80, P < .00003) in a nonlinear fashion such that it increased sharply after the age of 60 years. Finally, midwall radius was less tightly correlated with age (r = +.45, P < .05). Values for C, Rm, and Einc as well as the age dependency of these properties are similar to those reported previously when invasive techniques were used. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology constitutes a new tool to improve the clinical evaluation of regional aortic elastic properties in multiple disease states.
Authors: Reza Behkam; Kara E Roberts; Andrew J Bierhals; M Eileen Jacobs; Julia D Edgar; Randal C Paniello; Gayle Woodson; Jonathan P Vande Geest; Julie M Barkmeier-Kraemer Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-05-18
Authors: T Shchetynska-Marinova; M Kranert; S Baumann; V Liebe; A Grafen; S Gerhards; S Rosenkaimer; I Akin; M Borggrefe; A L Hohneck Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Francesca Tramacere; Alexander Kovalev; Thomas Kleinteich; Stanislav N Gorb; Barbara Mazzolai Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Johannes Gehron; Maximilian Schuster; Florian Rindler; Markus Bongert; Andreas Böning; Gabriele Krombach; Martin Fiebich; Philippe Grieshaber Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2020-06-12