Literature DB >> 792359

Comparative effectiveness of combinations of amikacin with penicillin G and amikacin with carbenicillin in gram-negative septicemia: double-blind clinical trial.

J Klastersky, C Hensgens, F Meunier-Carpentier.   

Abstract

Preliminary results are presented for an ongoing, double-blind, clinical trial, in which the efficacy of amikacin plus penicillin G (Amik-Pen) and amikacin plus carbenicillin (Amik-Carb) is compared in treatment of severe gram-negative infections superimposed on serious underlying disease. All clinical isolates were sensitive to amikacin in vitro (minimal inhibitory concentration, less than 12 mug/ml). Results in 50 patients with cancer and documented gram-negative infection, 29 of which involved septicemia, were analyzed. In the Amik-Pen group, 40% of 15 cases of septicemia responded favorable to therapy, as compared with 86% of 14 cases of septicemia in the Amik-Carb group; this difference is statistically significant (P less than 0.02). When all patients were considered together, the outcome appeared more favorable (1) in infections caused by pathogens sensitive to both antibiotics used then in those caused by organisms sensitive to amikacin only (83% vs. 43%); (2) when the combined antibiotics demonstrated synergy in virto against the offending pathogen than when the combination was nonsynergistic (83% vs. 38%); and (3) when the peak serum antimicrobial dilution titer was larger than or equal to 1:8 than when titers were lower. The results of this study suggest that routine use of an antibiotic combination that has demonstrable in vitro synergy against the offending pathogen should be considered for the treatment of proven or suspected severe infections due to gram-negative bacilli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 792359     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/135.supplement_2.s433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of bactericidal activity in body fluids as a clinical research procedure.

Authors:  P Dejace; J Klastersky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Comparison of azlocillin, ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, and amikacin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neutropenic-site rabbit model.

Authors:  L R Peterson; D N Gerding; J A Moody; C E Fasching
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Synergy between the iron chelator deferoxamine and the antimicrobial agents gentamicin, chloramphenicol, cefalothin, cefotiam and cefsulodin.

Authors:  B S van Asbeck; J H Marcelis; J H van Kats; E Y Jaarsma; J Verhoef
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  The pharmaco -, population and evolutionary dynamics of multi-drug therapy: experiments with S. aureus and E. coli and computer simulations.

Authors:  Peter Ankomah; Paul J T Johnson; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.