Literature DB >> 7922980

Genetic studies of 457 breast cancers. Clinicopathologic parameters compared with genetic alterations.

Y Harada1, T Katagiri, I Ito, F Akiyama, G Sakamoto, F Kasumi, Y Nakamura, M Emi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human breast cancers frequently show loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and/or amplification at specific chromosomal regions.
METHODS: To investigate the roles of these genetic alterations during tumor development and/or progression, 457 cases of primary breast cancer were examined for LOH at chromosomal regions 16q24, 17p13.3, and 17q21, and for amplification of the erb-B2 locus at 17q11.2 and the c-myc locus at 8q24. The genetic changes then were compared with lymph node metastasis, histologic type, and tumor stage.
RESULTS: The LOH at 17q21 was observed more frequently in tumors of the solid, tubular type (41 of 75 [55%]) than in other types (48 of 187 [26%]) (P < 0.0001). The LOH at 17p13.3 was more frequent in scirrhous and solid, tubular tumors (77 of 141 [55%] and 48 of 88 [55%]) than in other types (29 of 89 [33%]) (P = 0.0004). Generally, mutations were seen more often in tumors with axillary lymph node metastases, undifferentiated tumors, and large or invasive tumors than in tumors considered less aggressive histopathologically. However, 22 tumors bearing three or more genetic alterations were found among 187 tumors histologically diagnosed as free of axillary lymph node metastasis; similarly, 12 of 122 t1 classification tumors and 4 of 89 histologically well differentiated tumors each contained three or more genetic alterations. Although these tumors would be regarded as having a relatively good prognosis on the basis of conventional clinicopathologic diagnosis, the authors suspect that, in fact, they do not.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose tumors contain multiple genetic alterations should be treated as a new high risk group with respect to operative and/or postoperative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7922980     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941015)74:8<2281::aid-cncr2820740812>3.0.co;2-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  C-myc as a predictive marker for chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Nataša Todorović-Raković; Zora Nešković-Konstantinović; Dragica Nikolić-Vukosavljević
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Nuclear nano-morphology markers of histologically normal cells detect the "field effect" of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rajan K Bista; Pin Wang; Rohit Bhargava; Shikhar Uttam; Douglas J Hartman; Randall E Brand; Yang Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Identification of high-risk breast cancer patients from genetic changes of their tumors.

Authors:  M Watatani; H Inui; K Nagayama; Y Imanishi; K Nishimura; Y Hashimoto; E Yamauchi; T Hojo; Y Kotsuma; M Yamato; N Matsunami; M Yasutomi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Multiple chromosomal underrepresentations detected by interphase cytogenetics - possible prognostic markers in head and neck tumors?

Authors:  B Kleist; A Bankau; G Lorenz; M Poetsch
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Allelic imbalance at chromosome 17p13.3 (YNZ22) in breast cancer is independent of p53 mutation or p53 overexpression and is associated with poor prognosis at medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  A M Thompson; D N Crichton; R A Elton; M F Clay; U Chetty; C M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Localization of a breast cancer tumour-suppressor gene to a 3-cM interval within chromosomal region 16q22.

Authors:  A Iida; R Isobe; M Yoshimoto; F Kasumi; Y Nakamura; M Emi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Multiplex loss of heterozygosity analysis by using single or very few cells.

Authors:  Xiangfeng Cui; Helen Feiner; Honghua Li
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  C-myc amplification in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of its occurrence and prognostic relevance.

Authors:  S L Deming; S J Nass; R B Dickson; B J Trock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prognostic value of genomic alterations in minimal residual cancer cells purified from the blood of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Austrup; P Uciechowski; C Eder; B Böckmann; B Suchy; G Driesel; S Jäckel; I Kusiak; H J Grill; M Giesing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Frequent allelic loss at 7p14-15 associated with aggressive histologic types of breast cancer.

Authors:  K Kurose; A Iida; T Araki; G Sakamoto; F Kasumi; Y Nakamura; M Emi
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1998-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.