Literature DB >> 7921718

What price depression? The cost of depression and the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatment.

B Jönsson1, P E Bebbington.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: to measure the overall direct costs of depression for 1990 in the UK, and to develop a model to illustrate issues in the evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of the pharmacological treatment of depression. We compared a tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, with paroxetine, a newer antidepressant. For assessing the cost of illness, we used a top-down approach. We calculated direct but not indirect costs. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated by developing a simulation model based on the theory of clinical decision analysis to compare the costs and outcome of each treatment. From this we estimated the expected cost per patient and the cost per successfully treated patient. The total cost to the nation of depressive illness was estimated to be 222 pounds million. The expected costs per patient were found to be similar for paroxetine and imipramine (430 pounds v. 424 pounds). The costs per successfully treated patient were found to be lower for paroxetine (824 pounds) than for imipramine (1024 pounds). The results were stable when a sensitivity analysis was applied to the variables employed in the model. The most sensitive variable was the cost of treatment failure. Our model thus reveals that medication that appears expensive in terms of cost per day may not be so when patient compliance and the total costs of treatment are taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7921718     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.164.5.665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  43 in total

1.  Computer modelling. The need for careful evaluation and public audit.

Authors:  A Maynard; R F Cookson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Cost-of-illness studies. Useful for health policy?

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Depression in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  The use of consensus methods and expert panels in pharmacoeconomic studies. Practical applications and methodological shortcomings.

Authors:  C Evans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies.

Authors:  J Mason
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antidepressants : a critical appraisal of methods.

Authors:  Sheikh Usman Iqbal; Mark Prashker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Meta-analysis of antidepressant prescribing. Drop out rates presented in a misleading manner.

Authors:  N Freemantle; J Mason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

Review 8.  Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  M Hotopf; G Lewis; C Normand
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Paroxetine. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in depression and a review of its use in other disorders.

Authors:  N S Gunasekara; S Noble; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Escitalopram: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.