Literature DB >> 7920877

Comparative evaluation of body composition methods and predictions, and calculation of density and hydration fraction of fat-free mass, in obese women.

N J Fuller1, M B Sawyer, M Elia.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to apply a three-component model of body composition to a group of obese women in order to (a) establish the relative value of a number of readily available prediction equations by comparison of the extent of agreement between these predictions and body composition estimated by the model and other reference methods and (b) evaluate density and hydration of fat-free mass. Estimation of body composition was carried out by reference methods and prediction equations and the usefulness of these prediction equations for application specifically to obese women was evaluated. The subjects were 15 obese, otherwise healthy, Caucasian women (body mass index > 30kg/m2 and body fat > 40% of body weight, as originally determined using densitometry). Body composition was estimated using three established reference methods (deuterium dilution which primarily measures total body water, densitometry for body fat and fat-free mass and total body potassium) and the three component model constructed from deuterium dilution and densitometry. Density and hydration fraction of the fat-free mass were calculated from appropriate values obtained as integral parts of the three-component model. In addition, body composition was predicted from various prediction equations incorporating weight and height (some of which include a factor for age), from a number of prediction equations utilizing different terms involving the same whole-body bio-electrical impedance measurement and from measurements of skinfold thickness and near infrared interactance. The extent of agreement between methods was assessed using bias and 95% limits of agreement. Mean density of fat-free mass was found to be 1.104 kg/l (s.d. 0.006kg/l) with a range of 1.093 to 1.117 kg/l, and mean hydration fraction was 0.712 (s.d. 0.016) with a range of hydration from 68.2% to 75.1% (all values were calculated from the three-component model). In general, the reference methods (densitometry, deuterium dilution, the three-component model and total body potassium) demonstrated better agreement with each other than with the prediction methods or equations. In these obese women, skinfold thickness measurements are apparently less reliable (large bias and 95% limits of agreement) than in the lean subjects of a variety of other studies. A majority of interpretations of weight and height measurements and predictions incorporating impedance/resistance measurements are apparently not applicable to this group of obese women, due to large values for both bias and 95% limits of agreement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7920877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  6 in total

1.  Eating regulation styles, appearance schemas, and body satisfaction predict changes in body fat for emerging adults.

Authors:  Ali Zaremba Morgan; Margaret K Keiley; Aubrey E Ryan; Juliana Groves Radomski; Sareen S Gropper; Lenda Jo Connell; Karla P Simmons; Pamela V Ulrich
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2012-03-25

2.  Pulmonary function testing and complications of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Astrid van Huisstede; Laser Ulas Biter; Ronald Luitwieler; Manuel Castro Cabezas; Guido Mannaerts; Erwin Birnie; Christian Taube; Pieter S Hiemstra; Gert-Jan Braunstahl
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Utility of ultrasound for body fat assessment: validity and reliability compared to a multicompartment criterion.

Authors:  Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Malia N M Blue; Eric T Trexler; Katie R Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.273

4.  Comparative measurements of total body water in healthy volunteers by online breath deuterium measurement and other near-subject methods.

Authors:  David Smith; Barbara Engel; Ann M Diskin; Patrik Spanel; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Prevalence of normal weight obesity in Switzerland: effect of various definitions.

Authors:  Pedro Marques-Vidal; Alain Pécoud; Daniel Hayoz; Fred Paccaud; Vincent Mooser; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  High Hydration Factor in Older Hispanic-American Adults: Possible Implications for Accurate Body Composition Estimates.

Authors:  Rogelio González-Arellanes; Rene Urquidez-Romero; Alejandra Rodríguez-Tadeo; Julián Esparza-Romero; Rosa-Olivia Méndez-Estrada; Erik Ramírez-López; Alma-Elizabeth Robles-Sardin; Bertha-Isabel Pacheco-Moreno; Heliodoro Alemán-Mateo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.