Literature DB >> 7920683

Twenty-four hour pad weighing test: reproducibility and dependency of activity level and fluid intake.

A Rasmussen1, L Mouritsen, A Dalgaard, C Frimodt-Møller.   

Abstract

To evaluate the reproducibility of the 24 hour pad weighing test and the possible influence of fluid intake and level of activity to the test result, 14 women, referred for operation because of urinary incontinence, performed six 24 hour pad tests each under the following conditions: 2 tests on normal daily activity level and on normal fluid intake, 2 tests on high vs. low activity level, and 2 tests on high vs. low fluid intake. The study concludes that the results of the 24 hour pad weighing test are reproducible with moderate variation in fluid intake and activity level. Artificially low fluid intake or extreme variations in activity level could, however, significantly alter the urinary leakage. Small variations in fluid intake and activity level have no effect on the test result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7920683     DOI: 10.1002/1520-6777(1994)13:3<261::aid-nau1930130308>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  6 in total

1.  The repeatability of the 24-hour pad test.

Authors:  E Karantanis; W Allen; T L Stevermuer; A M Simons; R O'Sullivan; K H Moore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-07-07

2.  Fluid intake and risk of stress, urgency, and mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Mary K Townsend; Ying H Jura; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Danielle Markle Price; Karen Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  An objective measurement of urinary continence recovery with pelvic floor physiotherapy following robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Niranjan Jude Sathianathen; Liana Johnson; Damien Bolton; Nathan L Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07

5.  Daily Pad Usage Versus the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form for Continence Assessment Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Antonio Tienza; Petra L Graham; Jose E Robles; Fernando Diez-Caballero; David Rosell; Juan I Pascual; Manish I Patel; Sean F Mungovan
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Assessing variability of the 24-hour pad weight test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Rena D Malik; Joshua A Cohn; Pauline A Fedunok; Doreen E Chung; Gregory T Bales
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.