Literature DB >> 7917575

Costs and health effects of osteoporotic fractures.

E Chrischilles1, T Shireman, R Wallace.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to estimate the short- and long-term direct health care costs of hip, spine, and forearm fractures occurring during the remaining lifetimes of white post-menopausal women and to provide a prototype for estimating avoided costs of fractures in future cost-effectiveness analyses. A Markov model that uses population-based data and Monte Carlo simulations to estimate lifetime fracture risk, fracture-related functional impairment, and fracture-related costs for cohorts of individuals while controlling for competing causes of functional impairment and, hence, long-term costs is presented. Five cohorts of 10,000 women, each of a different age group, were simulated to obtain estimates of remaining lifetime fractures, functional impairment, and costs. Additional simulations tested the impact of discharge rates to and continued residence in nursing homes. Acute fracture care costs, nursing home annual cost, cost of community-based long-term care, and discount rates were varied in sensitivity analyses. Cohort costs were applied to the 1990 population distribution of U.S. white women to project future costs of women currently aged 45 years of age and older. Among hip, spine, and forearm fractures, hip fractures were determined to account for 36-50% of remaining lifetime fractures depending on age group of the cohort. Similarly, hip fractures were determined to account for 67-79% of fracture-related dependent functioning, 87-100% of fracture-related nursing home placement, and 87-96% of short-term fracture costs. Among white U.S. women aged 45 or older, an estimated 5.2 million hip, spine, and forearm fractures; 2 million person-years of fracture-related functional impairment; and $45.2 billion total direct medical costs can be expected in the next 10 years. Women aged 65-84 were estimated to experience the largest number of fractures, person-years of fracture-related impaired function, and fracture care costs in the next 10 years. Estimated lifetime cost was particularly sensitive to assumptions about fracture-related nursing home utilization rates. The future health and economic impact of established osteoporosis is expected to be substantial. Because we have included only three fracture sites, our estimates are likely to be conservative. Osteoporosis interventions that can reduce the need for fracture-related extended nursing home care and that are effective among women aged 65-84 are likely to be particularly cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7917575     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90813-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  66 in total

1.  Trends and Determinants of Osteoporosis Treatment and Screening in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gulsen Ozen; Diane L Kamen; Ted R Mikuls; Bryant R England; Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Coffee, tea and caffeine consumption in relation to osteoporotic fracture risk in a cohort of Swedish women.

Authors:  H Hallström; A Wolk; A Glynn; K Michaëlsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; Miki Sode; Isra Saeed; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Cancer therapy associated bone loss: implications for hip fractures in mid-life women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Beatrice J Edwards; Dennis W Raisch; Veena Shankaran; June M McKoy; William Gradishar; Andrew D Bunta; Athena T Samaras; Simone N Boyle; Charles L Bennett; Dennis P West; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The direct and indirect costs of the chronic management of osteoporosis: a prospective follow-up of 3440 active subjects.

Authors:  V Rabenda; C Manette; R Lemmens; A-M Mariani; N Struvay; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Psychotropic medications and the risk of fracture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bahi Takkouche; Agustín Montes-Martínez; Sudeep S Gill; Mahyar Etminan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  C M Lofthus; F Frihagen; H E Meyer; L Nordsletten; K Melhuus; J A Falch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Evaluation and management of osteoporosis following hospitalization for low-impact fracture.

Authors:  Christine Simonelli; Ya-Ting Chen; Julie Morancey; Anne F Lewis; Thomas A Abbott
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The effect of n-3 fatty acids on bone biomarkers in Iranian postmenopausal osteoporotic women: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pooneh Salari Sharif; Mahsa Asalforoush; Fatemeh Ameri; Bagher Larijani; Mohammad Abdollahi
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2009-12-05

Review 10.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.