Literature DB >> 7917218

Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin's disease: a comparative immunological, in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction study.

A F Lauritzen1, U Hørding, H W Nielsen.   

Abstract

During recent years numerous studies have demonstrated the presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in tissues affected by Hodgkin's disease (HD). The percentage of cases with evidence of EBV infection has varied among the different studies, a positive result being highly dependent on the sensitivity of the method employed. In this study three different methods of detecting EBV in 48 cases of 'classical' HD (33 cases of nodular sclerosis and 15 cases of mixed cellularity) were compared: Immunohistochemistry (IH) for detection of latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1), in situ hybridization (ISH) for detection of Epstein-Barr virus early RNAs (EBER 1 and 2), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of a reiterated 110 base-pair EBV genomic sequence of the BamHI region. In 14 cases (29%) Hodgkin's (H) and Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells were positive for LMP-1 using IH, and in 21 cases (44%) positive signals were seen in H-RS cells with EBER 1 and 2 probes using ISH. A few EBER-positive non-malignant lymphocytes were seen in 17 cases. Thirty-two cases (71%) were EBV-positive by PCR. It is concluded that the PCR technique is the most sensitive method for detecting EBV in HD. However, this method cannot provide information about the cellular localization of EBV. ISH with EBER 1 and 2 probes is superior to immunohistochemical detection of LMP-1 with regard to sensitivity. The advantage that the latter two methods have over the PCR techniques is that it is possible to analyse whether the EBV infection occurs in the H-RS cells or in the admixed non-malignant cell population. Furthermore, this study supports the observation that EBV is associated with a considerable number of HD cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7917218     DOI: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1994.tb05196.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

1.  Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg cells : no evidence for the persistence of integrated viral fragments inLatent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1)-negative classical Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  A Staratschek-Jox; S Kotkowski; G Belge; T Rüdiger; J Bullerdiek; V Diehl; J Wolf
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Epstein-Barr virus quantitation by real-time PCR targeting multiple gene segments: a novel approach to screen for the virus in paraffin-embedded tissue and plasma.

Authors:  Julie L Ryan; Hongxin Fan; Sally L Glaser; Steven A Schichman; Nancy Raab-Traub; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Epstein-Barr virus WZhet DNA can induce lytic replication in epithelial cells in vitro, although WZhet is not detectable in many human tissues in vivo.

Authors:  Julie L Ryan; Richard J Jones; Sandra H Elmore; Shannon C Kenney; George Miller; Jane C Schroeder; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Epstein-Barr virus expression in Hodgkin's disease in relation to patient characteristics, serum factors and blood lymphocyte function.

Authors:  U Axdorph; A Porwit-MacDonald; J Sjöberg; G Grimfors; M Ekman; W Wang; P Biberfeld; M Björkholm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  High levels of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in latently infected gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Julie L Ryan; Douglas R Morgan; Ricardo L Dominguez; Leigh B Thorne; Sandra H Elmore; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Jessica K Booker; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Bob-1 is expressed in classic Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Howayda S Abd El All
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.644

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.