Literature DB >> 7917111

Activation of naive, memory and effector T cells.

M Croft1.   

Abstract

An increased understanding of the types of T-cell subsets that exist in vivo, their relationships to one another, and how to identify and isolate them or effect their generation, has led to a comprehensive view of the antigen-presenting cells (APCs) which may be active and regulatory during the course of an immune response. Recent studies show that naive T cells only respond efficiently to dendritic cells and activated B cells whereas memory and effector cells respond to all APC types to some extent, including resting B cells. High level co-stimulatory molecule expression largely explains why APCs such as dendritic cells are far more effective stimulators than resting B cells. The available data, therefore, suggest that the requirement for co-stimulation, and hence capacity to respond to various APCs, is largely a function of the differentiation state of the T cell, and that previous encounter with antigen fundamentally increases the ability of T cells to subsequently respond to antigen rechallenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7917111     DOI: 10.1016/0952-7915(94)90123-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol        ISSN: 0952-7915            Impact factor:   7.486


  32 in total

1.  The tumour associated cell surface antigen A6H is costimulatory for human CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  T Labuda; E Parra; G Hedlund; T Kalland; M Dohlsten
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Antigen detection in vivo after immunization with different presentation forms of rabies virus antigen, II. Cellular, but not humoral, systemic immune responses against rabies virus immune-stimulating complexes are macrophage dependent.

Authors:  I J Claassen; A D Osterhaus; M Poelen; N Van Rooijen; E Claassen
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Antigen-independent changes in naive CD4 T cells with aging.

Authors:  P J Linton; L Haynes; N R Klinman; S L Swain
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

4.  CD28 days later: Resurrecting costimulation for CD8(+) memory T cells.

Authors:  Verena van der Heide; Dirk Homann
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and the immune system.

Authors:  P E Tarr
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Expansion of cytotoxic CD8+ CD28- T cells in healthy ageing people, including centenarians.

Authors:  F F Fagnoni; R Vescovini; M Mazzola; G Bologna; E Nigro; G Lavagetto; C Franceschi; M Passeri; P Sansoni
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 7.  Antigen-presenting cell engineering. The molecular toolbox.

Authors:  M L Tykocinski; D R Kaplan; M E Medof
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Human immunodeficiency virus integrates directly into naive resting CD4+ T cells but enters naive cells less efficiently than memory cells.

Authors:  Jihong Dai; Luis M Agosto; Clifford Baytop; Jianqing J Yu; Matthew J Pace; Megan K Liszewski; Una O'Doherty
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Accessory molecule regulation of naive CD4 T cell activation.

Authors:  C Dubey; M Croft
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.829

10.  Rel-deficient T cells exhibit defects in production of interleukin 3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  S Gerondakis; A Strasser; D Metcalf; G Grigoriadis; J Y Scheerlinck; R J Grumont
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.