Literature DB >> 7916811

Comparison of items in five-option and extended-matching formats for assessment of diagnostic skills.

S M Case1, D B Swanson, D R Ripkey.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7916811     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  [Quality improvement of multiple choice examinations: in psychiatry, psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy, and neurology].

Authors:  M Weih; D Harms; C Rauch; L Segarra; U Reulbach; U Degirmenci; M de Zwaan; S Schwab; J Kornhuber
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Guidelines for the construction of multiple choice questions tests.

Authors:  Mohammed O Al-Rukban
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2006-09

3.  The impact of two multiple-choice question formats on the problem-solving strategies used by novices and experts.

Authors:  Sylvain P Coderre; Peter Harasym; Henry Mandin; Gordon Fick
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Multiple choice questions are superior to extended matching questions to identify medicine and biomedical sciences students who perform poorly.

Authors:  Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Tessa L van den Brand; Maria T E Hopman
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2013-11

5.  Preferred question types for computer-based assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature study.

Authors:  Lisette van Bruggen; Margreet Manrique-van Woudenbergh; Emely Spierenburg; Jacqueline Vos
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2012-10-02

Review 6.  Exploring assessment of medical students' competencies in pain medicine-A review.

Authors:  Elspeth Erica Shipton; Carole Steketee; Frank Bate; Eric John Visser
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-12-12

7.  Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology.

Authors:  Meike Grumer; Peter Brüstle; Johann Lambeck; Silke Biller; Jochen Brich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.