Literature DB >> 7916156

Metabolic and thermoregulatory responses of the rat maintained in acrylic or wire-screen cages: implications for pharmacological studies.

C J Gordon1, L Fogelson.   

Abstract

Because of differences in thermal conductivity, it is likely that a rodent's thermoregulatory requirements and their response to drugs and other stimuli will vary in metal and acrylic cages. To address these issues, thermoregulatory responses were measured in rats housed in an environmental chamber with a floor made of either solid metal (aluminum) or acrylic materials (Plexiglas). Metabolic rate (M), evaporative water loss (E), thermal conductance (C), and tail skin (Tsk) and core temperature (Tc) were measured at ambient temperatures (Ta) of 10, 20, 28, 30, 32, and 34 degrees C. These thermoregulatory variables were essentially unaffected by floor type at Tas of 20 and 28 degrees C. The acrylic floor showed greater increases in M, E, Tc, and Tsk, but a smaller elevation in C as Ta increased from 28 to 34 degrees C. At a Ta of 10 degrees C, rats on the acrylic floor had a smaller M compared to that measured on the metal floor. Rats were then injected with saline or 30 mg/kg (SC) of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and placed in an acrylic cage with wood chip bedding or a wire-screen cage at a Ta of 20 degrees C. The MDMA caused Tc to increase > 2.0 degrees C in rats in the acrylic cage but had no effect on Tc of rats in the wire-screen cage. The marked effect of cage type on basal thermoregulatory processes and thermogenic response to MDMA should be useful in the design and interpretation of many pharmacological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7916156     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90263-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of technicians' ability to detect clinical signs in rats housed in wire-bottom versus solid-bottom cages with bedding.

Authors:  Terry R Van Vleet; James W Rhodes; C Robbie Waites; Beth E Schilling; David R Nelson; Todd A Jackson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  The role of monoamines in the changes in body temperature induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) and its derivatives.

Authors:  J R Docherty; A R Green
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Oral administration of (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and (+)methamphetamine alters temperature and activity in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Rebecca D Crean; Sophia A Davis; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 4.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of ecstasy-induced neurotoxicity: an overview.

Authors:  João Paulo Capela; Helena Carmo; Fernando Remião; Maria Lourdes Bastos; Andreas Meisel; Félix Carvalho
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  High ambient temperature facilitates the acquisition of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) self-administration.

Authors:  Shawn M Aarde; Pai-Kai Huang; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Small changes in ambient temperature cause large changes in 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced serotonin neurotoxicity and core body temperature in the rat.

Authors:  J E Malberg; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effect of Housing Types on Growth, Feeding, Physical Activity, and Anxiety-Like Behavior in Male Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Jennifer A Teske; Claudio Esteban Perez-Leighton; Emily E Noble; Chuanfeng Wang; Charles J Billington; Catherine M Kotz
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-02-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.