Literature DB >> 7914870

The degree of variation in DNA sequence recognition among four Drosophila homeotic proteins.

S C Ekker1, D G Jackson, D P von Kessler, B I Sun, K E Young, P A Beachy.   

Abstract

The homeodomain has been implicated as a major determinant of biological specificity for the homeotic selector (HOM) genes. We compare here the DNA sequence preferences of homeodomains encoded by four of the eight Drosophila HOM proteins. One of the four, Abdominal-B, binds preferentially to a sequence with an unusual 5'-T-T-A-T-3' core, whereas the other three prefer 5'-T-A-A-T-3'. Of these latter three, the Ultrabithorax and Antennapedia homeodomains display indistinguishable preferences outside the core while Deformed differs. Thus, with three distinct binding classes defined by four HOM proteins, differences in individual site recognition may account for some but not all of HOM protein functional specificity. We further show that amino acid residues within the N-terminal arm are responsible for the sequence specificity differences between the Ultrabithorax and Abdominal-B homeodomains. Similarities and differences at the corresponding positions within the N-terminal arms are conserved in the vertebrate Abdominal-B-like HOM proteins, which play critical roles in limb specifications as well as in regional specification along the anterior-posterior axis. This and other patterns of residue conservation suggest that differential DNA sequence recognition may play a role in HOM protein function in a wide range of organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7914870      PMCID: PMC395259          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06662.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  53 in total

1.  Recombinant circle PCR and recombination PCR for site-specific mutagenesis without PCR product purification.

Authors:  D H Jones; S C Winistorfer
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 2.  What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins?

Authors:  S Hayashi; M P Scott
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen.

Authors:  W Driever; G Thoma; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cooperative binding of an Ultrabithorax homeodomain protein to nearby and distant DNA sites.

Authors:  P A Beachy; J Varkey; K E Young; D P von Kessler; B I Sun; S C Ekker
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Cooperative DNA binding of the highly conserved human Hox 2.1 homeodomain gene product.

Authors:  C K Galang; C A Hauser
Journal:  New Biol       Date:  1992-05

6.  The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene.

Authors:  J J Zhao; R A Lazzarini; L Pick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae.

Authors:  N McGinnis; M A Kuziora; W McGinnis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Direct regulation of decapentaplegic by Ultrabithorax and its role in Drosophila midgut morphogenesis.

Authors:  M Capovilla; M Brandt; J Botas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Secondary structure determination for the Antennapedia homeodomain by nuclear magnetic resonance and evidence for a helix-turn-helix motif.

Authors:  G Otting; Y Q Qian; M Müller; M Affolter; W Gehring; K Wüthrich
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-12-20       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Structural complexity and evolutionary conservation of the Drosophila homeotic gene proboscipedia.

Authors:  D L Cribbs; M A Pultz; D Johnson; M Mazzulla; T C Kaufman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  76 in total

1.  Characterization of Hoxd1 protein-DNA-binding specificity using affinity chromatography and random DNA oligomer selection.

Authors:  P Kumar; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  Transcriptional regulation of the stem cell leukemia gene (SCL)--comparative analysis of five vertebrate SCL loci.

Authors:  Berthold Göttgens; Linda M Barton; Michael A Chapman; Angus M Sinclair; Bjarne Knudsen; Darren Grafham; James G R Gilbert; Jane Rogers; David R Bentley; Anthony R Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Regulation by homeoproteins: a comparison of deformed-responsive elements.

Authors:  J A Pederson; J W LaFollette; C Gross; A Veraksa; W McGinnis; J W Mahaffey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evolutionary conservation of regulatory elements in vertebrate Hox gene clusters.

Authors:  Simona Santini; Jeffrey L Boore; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior.

Authors:  Nicole A LaRonde-LeBlanc; Cynthia Wolberger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Sequence-specific DNA binding by the vnd/NK-2 homeodomain of Drosophila.

Authors:  Lan-Hsiang Wang; Rebecca Chmelik; Marshall Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Integration of an abdominal Hox complex with Pax2 yields cell-specific EGF secretion from Drosophila sensory precursor cells.

Authors:  David Li-Kroeger; Tiffany A Cook; Brian Gebelein
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus.

Authors:  C P Chang; L Brocchieri; W F Shen; C Largman; M L Cleary
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

10.  A structural model for a homeotic protein-extradenticle-DNA complex accounts for the choice of HOX protein in the heterodimer.

Authors:  S K Chan; R S Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.