Literature DB >> 7914564

Comparison of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping at 10-13 weeks' gestation.

K Nicolaides1, M de L Brizot, F Patel, R Snijders.   

Abstract

We did a prospective study of women with singleton viable pregnancies at 10-13 weeks' gestation who requested first-trimester fetal karyotyping because of advanced maternal age, parental anxiety, or family history of chromosomal abnormality. Women were counselled as to the available options of non-invasive screening or invasive testing by mid-trimester amniocentesis, early amniocentesis (EA), or chorionic villus sampling (CVS), or randomisation to EA or CVS at 10-13 weeks. EA was done in 731 patients (493 by choice and 238 by randomisation) and CVS in 570 (320 by choice and 250 by randomisation). Both procedures were done by transabdominal ultrasound-guided insertion of a 20-gauge needle. The rate of successful sampling was the same for both procedures (97.5%). Spontaneous loss (intrauterine or neonatal death) was significantly higher after EA (total group mean = 5.3%, 95% CI 3.8-7.2; randomised subgroup mean = 5.9%, 3.3-9.7) than after CVS (total group: mean = 2.3%, 1.2-3.9; randomised subgroup: mean = 1.2%, 0.3-3.5). The gestation at delivery and birthweight of the infants after EA and CVS were similar. In the EA group the incidence of talipes equinovarus (1.63%), was higher than in the CVS group (0.56%), but this difference was not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7914564     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91769-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  15 in total

Review 1.  Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies.

Authors:  M McKee; A Britton; N Black; K McPherson; C Sanderson; C Bain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

Review 2.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Club foot, an adverse outcome of early amniocentesis: disruption or deformation? CEMAT. Canadian Early and Mid-Trimester Amniocentesis Trial.

Authors:  S A Farrell; A M Summers; L Dallaire; J Singer; J A Johnson; R D Wilson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Kåre Birger Hagen; P J Devereaux; Dianne Bryant; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Andrew David Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-21

5.  Are randomized controlled trials controlled? Patient preferences and unblind trials.

Authors:  K McPherson; A R Britton; J E Wennberg
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Kate Navaratnam; Faris Mujezinovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-04

Review 7.  Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; K Sundberg; S Brigham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

8.  Second trimester amniocentesis is not a risk factor for very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mazza; Mariangela Pati; Emma Bertucci; Carlotta Cani; Silvia Latella; Giancarlo Gargano; Antonio Percesepe; Annibale Volpe
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-03

9.  Transabdominal embryofetoscopy for the detection of short rib-polydactyly syndrome, type II(Majewski), in the first trimester.

Authors:  Kook Lee; Jin Woo Lee; Doo Byung Chay; Sang Hee Lee; Si Hyun Cho; Bo Wook Kim; Ju Youn Hwang; Min Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.