Literature DB >> 7913674

Sample size estimation using repeated measurements on biomarkers as outcomes.

A J Kirby1, N Galai, A Muñoz.   

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to (1) examine methods of using longitudinal data in designing comparative trials and calculating sample sizes or power and (2) show the effect of autocorrelation of repeated measures on the assessment of sample sizes. A statistical model with a simple regression structure for the mean trajectory of the longitudinal data and a two-parameter model for the correlations of within-individual observations given by corr(yt,yt+s) = gamma s theta is used. The methods are illustrated by considering a two-group trial and investigating the effect of different values of the correlation parameters, gamma and theta on the sample size. The results show that taking account of the autocorrelation structure of longitudinal data may lead to more efficient designs. Specifically, the stronger the autocorrelation is, the smaller the sample size that is required.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7913674     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90054-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  7 in total

1.  Rule-of-thumb adjustment of sample sizes to accommodate dropouts in a two-stage analysis of repeated measurements.

Authors:  John E Overall; Scott Tonidandel; Robert R Starbuck
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  A Practical and Accurate Approximation for Carrying Out Repeated Measures Power Calculations.

Authors:  Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Commun Stat Case Stud Data Anal Appl       Date:  2016-02-24

3.  Optimal combination of number of participants and number of repeated measurements in longitudinal studies with time-varying exposure.

Authors:  Jose Barrera-Gómez; Donna Spiegelman; Xavier Basagaña
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Insights from the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study.

Authors:  Lawrence Copelovitch; Bradley A Warady; Susan L Furth
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Multiplex assay reliability and long-term intra-individual variation of serologic inflammatory biomarkers.

Authors:  Heather S McKay; Joseph B Margolick; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Joseph Lopez; John Phair; Giovanna Rappocciolo; Thomas N Denny; Larry I Magpantay; Lisa P Jacobson; Jay H Bream
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.861

6.  Sample Size Determination for Studies with Repeated Continuous Outcomes.

Authors:  Dulal K Bhaumik; Anindya Roy; Subhash Aryal; Kwan Hur; Naihua Duan; Sharon-Lise T Normand; C Hendricks Brown; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Psychiatr Ann       Date:  2008-12-01

7.  Power and sample size calculations for longitudinal studies comparing rates of change with a time-varying exposure.

Authors:  X Basagaña; D Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.