Literature DB >> 7912711

DNA double-strand break measurement in mammalian cells by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: an approach using restriction enzymes and gene probing.

M Löbrich1, S Ikpeme, J Kiefer.   

Abstract

DNA samples prepared from human SP3 cells, which had been exposed to various doses of X-ray, were treated with NotI restriction endonuclease before being run in a contour-clamped homogeneous electrophoresis system. The restriction enzyme cuts the DNA at defined positions delivering DNA sizes which can be resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). In order to investigate only one of the DNA fragments, a human lactoferrin cDNA, pHL-41, was hybridized to the DNA separated by PFGE. As a result, only the DNA fragment which contains the hybridized gene was detected resulting in a one-band pattern. The decrease of this band was found to be exponential with increasing radiation dose. From the slope, a double-strand break induction rate of (6.3 +/- 0.7) x 10(-3)/Mbp/Gy was deduced for 80 kV X-rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7912711     DOI: 10.1080/09553009414550731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks misrepair is not compromized by broken DNA in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  G Alsbeih; W A Brock; N Terry; M D Story
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Processing of clustered DNA damage generates additional double-strand breaks in mammalian cells post-irradiation.

Authors:  Melanie Gulston; Catherine de Lara; Terry Jenner; Emma Davis; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Targeting abnormal DNA double-strand break repair in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukemias.

Authors:  L A Tobin; C Robert; A P Rapoport; I Gojo; M R Baer; A E Tomkinson; F V Rassool
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific Not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends.

Authors:  M Löbrich; B Rydberg; P K Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Clustered DNA damage induced by gamma radiation in human fibroblasts (HF19), hamster (V79-4) cells and plasmid DNA is revealed as Fpg and Nth sensitive sites.

Authors:  Melanie Gulston; Jonathan Fulford; Terry Jenner; Catherine de Lara; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  In vivo radioadaptive response: a review of studies relevant to radiation-induced cancer risk.

Authors:  M Nenoi; B Wang; G Vares
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Radiation, inflammation and the immune response in cancer.

Authors:  Kelly J McKelvey; Amanda L Hudson; Michael Back; Tom Eade; Connie I Diakos
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Evaluation of different biomarkers to predict individual radiosensitivity in an inter-laboratory comparison--lessons for future studies.

Authors:  Burkhard Greve; Tobias Bölling; Susanne Amler; Ute Rössler; Maria Gomolka; Claudia Mayer; Odilia Popanda; Kristin Dreffke; Astrid Rickinger; Eberhard Fritz; Friederike Eckardt-Schupp; Christina Sauerland; Herbert Braselmann; Wiebke Sauter; Thomas Illig; Dorothea Riesenbeck; Stefan Könemann; Normann Willich; Simone Mörtl; Hans Theodor Eich; Peter Schmezer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The shape of the radiation dose response for DNA double-strand break induction and repair.

Authors:  Stephen Barnard; Simon Bouffler; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2013-03-22

10.  Radiosensitivity of human tumour cells is correlated with the induction but not with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  R A El-Awady; E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.