Literature DB >> 7911672

Individual differences in schedule-induced and conditioned behaviors.

M S Hooks1, G H Jones, J L Juncos, D B Neill, J B Justice.   

Abstract

Previous experiments have shown that subjects which exhibit a high locomotor response to novelty (HR) also show a greater locomotor response to psychomotor stimulants than subjects which have a low locomotor response to a novel environment (LR). The current experiments were designed to examine in more detail the behavioral differences between HR and LR rats in non-drug paradigms. In the first experiment HR rats acquired schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) more readily than LR rats. Panel pressing to gain access to the food pellets, however, was greater in LR rats compared to HR rats, especially after stable levels of SIP had been attained. In the second experiment one group of rats were fed daily after a 30-min period in photocell-cages (food conditioning; FC) while a control group was fed in the home-cage (non-conditioned; NC). FC subjects developed heightened locomotor activity in anticipation of feeding in the initial 30 min in the test-cage compared to NC rats. This anticipatory locomotor activity developed more rapidly and to a greater level in HR rats than in LR rats. The concentrations of dopamine, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, homovanillic acid, serotonin, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, and norepinephrine were determined at the completion of behavioral testing in both the food conditioned and non-conditioned rats. The food conditioned experiment showed that variations in both the dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems may underlie individual differences in behavioral responsiveness. However, no clear pattern of neurochemical differences emerged. The current set of experiments have demonstrated differences between HR and LR rats in non-drug related paradigms and that HR rats appear to show a greater motivational excitement induced by periodic food delivery than LR rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7911672     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90148-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

Review 1.  Schedule-induced polydipsia as a model of compulsive behavior: neuropharmacological and neuroendocrine bases.

Authors:  Margarita Moreno; Pilar Flores
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Poor inhibitory control and neurochemical differences in high compulsive drinker rats selected by schedule-induced polydipsia.

Authors:  Margarita Moreno; Valeria Edith Gutiérrez-Ferre; Luis Ruedas; Leticia Campa; Cristina Suñol; Pilar Flores
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug.

Authors:  P J Pierre; P Vezina
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Impulsivity as long-term sequelae after chlorpyrifos intoxication: time course and individual differences.

Authors:  D Cardona; G López-Crespo; M C Sánchez-Amate; P Flores; F Sánchez-Santed
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.911

5.  Acetyl-L-carnitine reduces impulsive behaviour in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Walter Adriani; Monica Rea; Marta Baviera; William Invernizzi; Mirjana Carli; Orlando Ghirardi; Antonio Caprioli; Giovanni Laviola
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Getting specialized: presynaptic and postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptors.

Authors:  Claudia De Mei; Maria Ramos; Chisato Iitaka; Emiliana Borrelli
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.547

7.  Individual differences in schedule-induced polydipsia and the role of gabaergic and dopaminergic systems.

Authors:  M López-Grancha; G Lopez-Crespo; M C Sanchez-Amate; P Flores
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The amphetamine sensitization model of schizophrenia symptoms and its effect on schedule-induced polydipsia in the rat.

Authors:  Emily R Hawken; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis, Homeostatic Satiety, and Compulsions: What Can We Learn From Polydipsia?

Authors:  Tomek J Banasikowski; Emily R Hawken
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Increased drinking following social isolation rearing: implications for polydipsia associated with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emily R Hawken; Nicholas J Delva; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.