Literature DB >> 7910565

The stability and hydrophobicity of cytosolic and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenases and their relation to chaperonin-assisted folding.

R A Staniforth1, A Cortés, S G Burston, T Atkinson, J J Holbrook, A R Clarke.   

Abstract

mMDH and cMDH are structurally homologous enzymes which show very different responses to chaperonins during folding. The hydrophilic and stable cMDH is bound by cpn60 but released by Mg-ATP alone, while the hydrophobic and unstable mMDH requires both Mg-ATP and cpn10. Citrate equalises the stability of the native state of the two proteins but has no effect on the co-chaperonin requirement, implying that hydrophobicity, and not stability, is the determining factor. The yield and rate of folding of cMDH is unaffected while that of mMDH is markedly increased by the presence of cpn60, cpn10 and Mg-ATP. In 200 mM orthophosphate, chaperonins do not enhance the rate of folding of mMDH, but in low phosphate concentrations chaperonin-assisted folding is 3-4-times faster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7910565     DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00348-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


  10 in total

1.  GroES in the asymmetric GroEL14-GroES7 complex exchanges via an associative mechanism.

Authors:  P M Horowitz; G H Lorimer; J Ybarra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Opposite behavior of two isozymes when refolding in the presence of non-ionic detergents.

Authors:  F Doñate; A Artigues; A Iriarte; M Martinez-Carrion
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Significance of chaperonin 10-mediated inhibition of ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60.

Authors:  Y Dubaquié; R Looser; S Rospert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.

Authors:  George Stan; Bernard R Brooks; George H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity.

Authors:  J D Wang; M D Michelitsch; J S Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Chaperonins.

Authors:  N A Ranson; H E White; H R Saibil
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Recognition of partially-folded mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase by GroEL. Steady and time-dependent emission anisotropy measurements.

Authors:  J E Churchich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  23S rRNA assisted folding of cytoplasmic malate dehydrogenase is distinctly different from its self-folding.

Authors:  Suparna Chandra Sanyal; Saumen Pal; Saheli Chowdhury; Chanchal DasGupta; Saheli Chaudhuri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Coupling between protein folding and allostery in the GroE chaperonin system.

Authors:  O Yifrach; A Horovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.