Literature DB >> 7910237

Limitations of compression ultrasound for the detection of symptomless postoperative deep vein thrombosis.

L M Jongbloets1, A W Lensing, M M Koopman, H R Büller, J W ten Cate.   

Abstract

Compression ultrasonography is regarded as the non-invasive gold-standard to detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients presenting with symptoms. However, its use as a screening method in symptom-free postoperative patients at high risk of developing DVT remains controversial. In 100 consecutive patients who had undergone craniotomy, we compared the results of bilateral compression ultrasonic measurements of the results of bilateral compression ultrasonic measurements of the entire legs with the outcomes of contrast venography. Proximal DVT was detected in 13 patients, 5 of whom also had an abnormal ultrasonic result (sensitivity 38%, 95% CI 8-69%). Only 5 of the 9 patients with an abnormal ultrasound result for the proximal veins had proximal DVT (positive predictive value, 56%, 18-94%). Calf sonograms were evaluable in 71 of the 91 patients with bilaterally normal ultrasound results for the proximal veins. Of the 16 patients with calf DVT, ultrasound was abnormal in 8 (sensitivity 50%, 25-75%). Overall, ultrasound detected 13 of the 26 patients with proximal or isolated calf DVT (sensitivity 50%, 29-71%). The positive predictive value for the whole leg examination was 41% (24-60%). Most thrombi missed by ultrasound were non-occlusive and smaller than 5 cm. We conclude that compression ultrasound is not useful for screening for DVT in symptom-free postoperative high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7910237     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90240-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: time to rewrite the textbooks.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Investigation of suspected lower limb venous thrombosis.

Authors:  G R Sissons
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Internal medicine update: seven important advances in medical diagnosis and management for the general internist.

Authors:  L Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The role of ultrasonography in thromboembolic disease management in the orthopaedic patient.

Authors:  W J Ciccone; J S Reid; V D Pellegrini
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

5.  Doppler ultrasonographic examination of the leg veins of patients with Parkinson disease.

Authors:  B E Burbridge; J K Wallace; A Rajput; L McCulloch
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Dalteparin vs low-dose unfractionated heparin for prophylaxis against clinically evident venous thromboembolism in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Scott Worley; Christine Short; Jeff Pike; David Anderson; Jo-Anne Douglas; Kara Thompson
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Jean-Pierre Boissel; Michel Cucherat; Sandrine Sonie; Nirav R Shah; Alain Leizorovicz
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  The rate of missed diagnosis of lower-limb DVT by ultrasound amounts to 50% or so in patients without symptoms of DVT: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuhong Zhang; Haifa Xia; Yaxin Wang; Lin Chen; Shengnan Li; Idrees Ali Hussein; Yan Wu; You Shang; Shanglong Yao; Ruofei Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.