Literature DB >> 7909514

Conservation of a functional hierarchy between mammalian and insect Hox/HOM genes.

D Bachiller1, A Macías, D Duboule, G Morata.   

Abstract

We have generated several transgenic Drosophila strains containing different mouse Hox genes under heat shock control and studied how their generalized expression affects Drosophila larval patterns. We find that they have spatially restricted effects which correlate with their genetic order and expression pattern in the mouse; as they are expressed more posteriorly in the mouse, they have more extensive effects in Drosophila. The generalized expressions of Hoxd-8 and d-9 modify Drosophila anterior head segment(s), but have no effect in the rest of the body. Hoxd-10 expression affects head and thorax, but not the abdomen. Finally, Hoxd-11 alters head, thorax not the abdomen. Finally, Hoxd-11 alters head, thorax and abdomen. The developmental effect of the Hox genes consists of a homeotic transformation of the affected segment(s), which exhibit a 'ground' pattern similar to that obtained in the absence of homeotic information, suggesting that Hox genes are able to inactivate Drosophila homeotic genes, but do not specify a pattern of their own. A partial exception is Hoxd-11 which, even though it has a general suppressing effect, can also activate the resident Abdominal-B and empty spiracles genes in ectopic positions. Our results strongly suggest a general conservation of the functional hierarchy of homeotic genes that correlates with genetic order and expression patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7909514      PMCID: PMC395034          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06462.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  48 in total

Review 1.  Patterning in the vertebrate limb.

Authors:  D Duboule
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  The localization and regulation of Antennapedia protein expression in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  S B Carroll; R A Laymon; M A McCutcheon; P D Riley; M P Scott
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  cis-acting DNA sequence requirements for P-element transposition.

Authors:  M C Mullins; D C Rio; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5.

Authors:  O Chisaka; M R Capecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genetic organization of Drosophila bithorax complex.

Authors:  E Sánchez-Herrero; I Vernós; R Marco; G Morata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jan 10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene.

Authors:  J J Zhao; R A Lazzarini; L Pick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  abdA expression in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  F Karch; W Bender; B Weiffenbach
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae.

Authors:  N McGinnis; M A Kuziora; W McGinnis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Autocatalysis and phenotypic expression of Drosophila homeotic gene Deformed: its dependence on polarity and homeotic gene function.

Authors:  A González-Reyes; A Macías; G Morata
Journal:  Development       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  HOX4 genes encode transcription factors with potential auto- and cross-regulatory capacities.

Authors:  V Zappavigna; A Renucci; J C Izpisúa-Belmonte; G Urier; C Peschle; D Duboule
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  20 in total

1.  Variable motif utilization in homeotic selector (Hox)-cofactor complex formation controls specificity.

Authors:  Katherine M Lelli; Barbara Noro; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comprehensive expression profiling of highly homologous 39 hox genes in 26 different human adult tissues by the modified systematic multiplex RT-pCR method reveals tissue-specific expression pattern that suggests an important role of chromosomal structure in the regulation of hox gene expression in adult tissues.

Authors:  Miyako Yamamoto; Daisaku Takai; Fumiya Yamamoto; Fumiichiro Yamamoto
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2003

3.  Characterization of the 3' untranslated region of the mouse homeobox gene HoxB5.

Authors:  C C Yu; C J Paige; G E Wu
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1995-06-14

4.  Evolution of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes.

Authors:  J Zhang; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Functional hierarchy and phenotypic suppression among Drosophila homeotic genes: the labial and empty spiracles genes.

Authors:  A Macías; G Morata
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  The expression pattern of the murine Hoxa-10 gene and the sequence recognition of its homeodomain reveal specific properties of Abdominal B-like genes.

Authors:  G V Benson; T H Nguyen; R L Maas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites.

Authors:  K M Catron; H Zhang; S C Marshall; J A Inostroza; J M Wilson; C Abate
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites.

Authors:  Tim Zeiske; Nithya Baburajendran; Anna Kaczynska; Julia Brasch; Arthur G Palmer; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry Honig; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Competition for cofactor-dependent DNA binding underlies Hox phenotypic suppression.

Authors:  Barbara Noro; Katherine Lelli; Liping Sun; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 10.  Bacteria as computers making computers.

Authors:  Antoine Danchin
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 16.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.