Literature DB >> 7908810

Osmolal and anion gaps in patients admitted to an emergency medical department.

L Aabakken1, K S Johansen, E B Rydningen, J E Bredesen, S Ovrebø, D Jacobsen.   

Abstract

1. Osmolal and anion gaps are helpful in the diagnosis and evaluation of intoxications with methanol and ethylene glycol. Reported reference values for osmolal gap and anion gap are -1 (+/- 6) mosm kg-1 H2O and 16 (+/- 2) mmol l-1, respectively. However, we have repeatedly found unexplained increased gaps in patients admitted to our department, and the relevance of the established reference values has been questioned. 2. Osmolal and anion gaps were determined in an unselected population of patients consecutively admitted to an emergency medical department. In the case of unexplained gaps, the blood samples were analysed with respect to the presence of alcohols and organic acids. 3. We included all accessible patients admitted during 14 days. Appropriate blood samples were obtained in 177 patients (88 male, 89 female), with a mean age of 65 years (range 17-94). 4. The mean and (standard deviation) for osmolal and anion gaps in our material were 5.2 mosm kg-1 H2O (7.0) and 12.9 mmol/l (4.2). Neither methanol nor ethylene-glycol was detected in serum from any patients. Small amounts of ethanol were found in 5 patients, and high lactate levels explained in part the most extensively increased anion gaps. However, the calculated analytical standard deviation accounted entirely for the variation in our material, and we suggest that the present reference values be adjusted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7908810     DOI: 10.1177/096032719401300212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol        ISSN: 0960-3271            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Early dialysis in a rare case of combined toxic alcohols ingestion.

Authors:  Carmen Elena Cervantes; Andrew Chu; Daniel Heller; Michael Lemont
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-01

2.  Anion and osmolal gaps in the diagnosis of methanol poisoning: clinical study in 28 patients.

Authors:  Knut Erik Hovda; Odd Helge Hunderi; Nina Rudberg; Sten Froyshov; Dag Jacobsen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Management of the critically poisoned patient.

Authors:  Jennifer S Boyle; Laura K Bechtel; Christopher P Holstege
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Antidotes for poisoning by alcohols that form toxic metabolites.

Authors:  Kenneth McMartin; Dag Jacobsen; Knut Erik Hovda
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Positive serum ethanol concentration on admission to hospital as the factor predictive of treatment outcome in acute methanol poisoning.

Authors:  Sergey Zakharov; Olga Nurieva; Katerina Kotikova; Jaromir Belacek; Tomas Navratil; Daniela Pelclova
Journal:  Monatsh Chem       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 1.451

6.  An evaluation of the osmole gap as a screening test for toxic alcohol poisoning.

Authors:  Larry D Lynd; Kathryn J Richardson; Roy A Purssell; Riyad B Abu-Laban; Jeffery R Brubacher; Katherine J Lepik; Marco L A Sivilotti
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-04-28

7.  Intermittent hemodialysis is superior to continuous veno-venous hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration to eliminate methanol and formate during treatment for methanol poisoning.

Authors:  Sergey Zakharov; Daniela Pelclova; Tomas Navratil; Jaromir Belacek; Ivana Kurcova; Ondrej Komzak; Tomas Salek; Jiri Latta; Radovan Turek; Robert Bocek; Cyril Kucera; Jaroslav A Hubacek; Zdenka Fenclova; Vit Petrik; Martin Cermak; Knut Erik Hovda
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 10.612

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.