Literature DB >> 7908243

Clinical development of anticancer agents from natural products.

D R Parkinson1, S G Arbuck, T Moore, J M Pluda, M C Christian.   

Abstract

Recent years have seen the introduction into clinical trials of new classes of chemotherapeutic agents which are derived from natural sources and have novel mechanisms of action. Examples of some of these newer classes of agents are presented here to illustrate both the opportunities they represent with respect to cancer treatment applications and the challenges which they represent from the clinical development perspective. Cumulatively the problems encountered with the development of the agents described are representative of the spectrum of issues encountered in the development of natural products, ranging from initial characterization and purification through the difficulties encountered in obtaining sufficient quantities of material for preclinical studies and then ultimately for clinical trials. Since these agents have unique mechanisms of action and are often exquisitely dose- and schedule-dependent in pre-clinical studies, they represent significant complexities with respect to determining the optimal regimen of administration clinically. The particular agents chosen for description here represent the spectrum of natural source-derived materials as well as mechanisms of action. The taxanes are derived from tree sources and interfere with the mitotic spindle apparatus; the camptothecins, while also derived from trees, appear to exert their activity through interactions with topoisomerase I. Bryostatin, derived from a marine animal, has powerful effects on protein kinase C (PKC), and therefore affects signal transduction pathways within cells. Fumagillin analogs appear to exhibit their important antitumor activity not through a direct effect on cancer cells but rather through effects on the tumor neovasculature. Taken as a whole, the spectrum of agents and activities described here confirms the continued importance of natural products in current anticancer agent development and reflects the complexities involved in this area of clinical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7908243     DOI: 10.1002/stem.5530120108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  4 in total

1.  Anti-cancer effects of 20(S)-protopanoxadiol on human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines Reh and RS4;11.

Authors:  Lihua Sun; Qiong Wang; Xinmin Liu; Nicolaas H C Brons; Ning Wang; André Steinmetz; Yali Lv; Yonghong Liao; Huyong Zheng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Identification of ING4 (inhibitor of growth 4) as a modulator of docetaxel sensitivity in human lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Jiayuan Huang; Bing Feng; Wei De; Longbang Chen
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.354

3.  Phenylboronic acid selectively inhibits human prostate and breast cancer cell migration and decreases viability.

Authors:  Tiffany M Bradke; Casey Hall; Stephen W Carper; George E Plopper
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Ursolic acid benzaldehyde chalcone, leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and arrests cycle in G1/G0 phase in colon cancer.

Authors:  Xinying Zhuang; Aihua Dong; Ruicai Wang; Hongyun Cao
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.219

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.