Literature DB >> 7908010

Implants of pure titanium for internal fixation of the peripheral skeleton.

K M Pfeiffer1, J Brennwald, U Büchler, D Hanel, J Jupiter, K Lowka, J Mark, P Staehlin.   

Abstract

In a multicentre study, a clinical evaluation of the new titanium implants of the sizes 2.7, 2.0 and 1.5 mm was done. In seven centres, 133 patients were operated on and the personal, subjective opinions of the surgeons were recorded. In the opinion of these surgeons experienced in using steel implants, the outcome of the internal fixations was the same for titanium as for steel implants. Three metal-related complications occurred in the smallest size screw type (1.5 mm), namely, one screw broke and two bent. In the cases in which the implant had been removed, good tissue contact with the implant could be seen. Only in one case was there discolouring of the soft tissue due to titanium. It is recommended that surgeons who are used to handling stainless steel screws should be aware of the slightly different behaviour of titanium screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7908010     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90108-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  3 in total

1.  [Challenging the dogma on inferiority of stainless steel implants for fracture fixation. An end of the controversy?].

Authors:  S Weckbach; J T Losacco; J Hahnhaussen; F Gebhard; P F Stahel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Ulnar shortening osteotomy in posttraumatic ulnar impaction syndrome.

Authors:  R Fricker; K M Pfeiffer; H Troeger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Late removal of titanium hardware from the elbow is problematic.

Authors:  Abdo Bachoura; Ruriko Yoshida; Christian Lattermann; Srinath Kamineni
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-02-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.