Literature DB >> 7906597

Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury.

D N Cowan1, B H Jones, J R Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is widely accepted that persons with flat or high-arched feet are at increased risk of exercise-associated injury, even though this purported association has not been scientifically evaluated. We evaluate the risk of exercise-associated injury among young men with flat, normal, and high-arched feet.
DESIGN: A prospective study of 246 US Army Infantry trainees followed up over a rigorous 12-week training program. All subjects were evaluated prior to onset of training. Evaluation included photographs of the right, weight-bearing foot that were digitized and utilized to make several measures of arch height.
SETTING: An army initial entry training center.
SUBJECTS: All trainees beginning army training on 2 successive weeks were potential volunteers. There were no criteria for exclusion other than declining to participate (n = 3). The subjects were healthy, active young men with a mean age of 20.3 years. OUTCOME MEASURE: The occurrence of a lower-extremity musculoskeletal injury resulting in a visit to and a diagnosis by an army physician or physician assistant. Treating physicians and physician assistants were blind to participation status and were not study staff members.
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, there was an association between arch height and risk of injury using several alternative operational definitions of foot type. The 20% with the flattest feet were at the lowest risk (reference group; odds ratio, 1.0), with adjusted odds ratios for any musculoskeletal injury of 3.0 (P < .05) for the middle 60% group and 6.1 (P < .05) for the highest 20% group.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the hypothesis that low-arched individuals are at increased risk of injury, and they have implications for runners, exercise enthusiasts, and clinicians. It may be possible to prevent substantial morbidity among active populations by identifying individuals at high risk and advising alternate activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7906597     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.2.7.773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  41 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D F Murphy; D A J Connolly; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Differences in sole arch indices in various sports.

Authors:  S T Aydog; O Tetik; H A Demirel; M N Doral
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Assessment and evaluation of predisposing factors to anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  C M Bonci
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Standardizing foot-type classification using arch index values.

Authors:  Christopher Kevin Wong; Rich Weil; Emily de Boer
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 5.  Biomechanical risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries.

Authors:  F G Neely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Flat Foot in a Random Population and its Impact on Quality of Life and Functionality.

Authors:  Salvador Pita-Fernandez; Cristina Gonzalez-Martin; Francisco Alonso-Tajes; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Sonia Pertega-Diaz; Sergio Perez-Garcia; Rocio Seijo-Bestilleiro; Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Increased medial longitudinal arch mobility, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction forces in high-arched runners.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Robin N Tierney; Robert J Butler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Prevention of overuse sports injuries in the young athlete.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno; Jeffery A Taylor-Haas; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot.

Authors:  Thomas G McPoil; Bill Vicenzino; Mark W Cornwall; Natalie Collins; Meghan Warren
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.